But a close reading shows DOE made plenty of mistakes as well.
The report authored by DOE Inspector General Gregory H. Friedman came just short
of calling Solyndra’s highest officials liars, saying their actions during the
loan process were “at best, reckless and irresponsible or, at worst, an
orchestrated effort to knowingly and intentionally deceive and mislead the
Department.”
While the 13-page report also criticizes DOE officials for not sufficiently
vetting Solyndra and mentions political pressure placed on unnamed DOE employees
to get the loan pushed through as part of the Obama administration’s stimulus
program, it does not go into many specifics — especially about the political
aspect of the case.
Instead, the report placed the lion’s share of fault on the solar company’s
officials, saying they “were at the heart of this matter” that soaked U.S.
taxpayers of more than half a billion dollars in federal loans after the company
went broke.
That conclusion riles William Yeatman, senior fellow specializing in
environmental policy and energy markets at the Competitive Enterprise Institute,
a policy group that advocates for limited government, who called the IG report
“a conspicuous whitewash” that tries to absolve DOE.
“It’s an outrage,” Yeatman told Watchdog.org, adding he has admired Friedman’s
work in the past.
“I can’t explain the impossibly inappropriate emphasis on Solyndra’s
culpability,” Yeatman said. “The report is rife with this language that is to
lay the blame at the foot of Solyndra rather than the DOE.”
Watchdog.org left a voicemail message with the media inquiries phone number at
Friedman’s office Friday, but did not receive a response.
Click here to read the 13-page inspector general’s report on what went wrong in
the $535 million Solyndra deal
In 2009, DOE began the first of a series of loan guarantees calling for up to
$535 million to Solyndra to construct a photovoltaic manufacturing facility in
Fremont, California. In 2010, President Obama visited the plant and said, “It’s
here that companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more
prosperous future.”
But just a year after the Obama visit Solyndra collapsed, filing for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection, largely due to companies in places like China that were
able to produce solar panels at a lower price.
The political fallout was harsh, with Republicans on Capitol Hill pouncing on
the White House.
After four years of investigating, the IG report came out last week, citing a
litany of allegations against Solyndra executives, accusing them of deception
during the loan process.
In one instance, the report said Solyndra claimed it had $1.4 billion in sales
contracts lined up over a five-year period but didn’t tell DOE or an independent
engineering firm hired by the agency that price concessions had been made to
three of the four companies.
That “distorted the view the Department and its consultants had of the market
for Solyndra’s product,” the report said.
However, the report went on to say DOE had a spreadsheet in its possession
showing the four companies’ sales contracts weren’t quite what they seemed.
But the agency’s loan officers “who received this spreadsheet each told us they
did not examine it closely,” the report said. “While Solyndra did nothing to
highlight or emphasize the new information, the Department missed an
opportunity, prior to loan closing, to evaluate the fact that Solyndra’s
contract customers were not buying product at the contracted terms.”
“They simply didn’t pay attention to this,” Yeatman said in a telephone
interview. “That information was quantitative, hard data that, if (DOE) had paid
attention to, made clear that this was a bad deal …What a piss-poor job the
government does when it plays banker.”
In addition, a week before the loan closing, an employee noticed the price of
rooftop solar systems was projected to be much lower than Solyndra’s estimates
and sent three emails to top DOE loan officials alerting them to the issue.
“Yet, no action was taken,” the report said. “Instead, it was apparently
disregarded.”
Later in the report, the inspector general mentions political stress placed on
employees at DOE.
[to top of second column] |
Excerpt from page 2 of the Department of Energy Inspector
General's report on its four-year investigation into the Solyndra
loan.
Excerpt from page 2 of the Department of Energy Inspector General’s
report on its four-year investigation into the Solyndra loan.
“Employees acknowledged that they felt tremendous pressure, in
general, to process loan guarantee applications,” the report said.
“They suggested the pressure was based on the significant interest
in the program from Department leadership, the Administration,
Congress, and the applicants.”
But the 13-page report doesn’t dig into any of the specifics of who
received pressure and who exactly in DOE leadership, Obama
administration or Congress was applying it.
That irritates David Boaz, executive vice president of the Cato
Institute, a libertarian think tank based in Washington D.C.
“There was a lot of political pressure put on bureaucrats to approve
loans to Solyndra and other companies that fit the ideological
predisposition of Obama appointees,” Boaz told Watchdog.org. “The
more controversial question is whether the political pressure
reflected actual political and financial interests. The report shies
away from getting too close from that question.”
Instead, Friedman’s conclusions centered on Solyndra.
Logo from the U.S. Department of Energy website
Logo from the U.S. Department of Energy website
GOING EASY ON THE DEPARTMENT?: A 13-page report from the Inspector
General of the U.S. Department of Energy puts most of the blame on
the half-million loss to taxpayers on a loan to Solyndra on the
company, not the department.
“While the Department’s due diligence effort had shortcomings, it is
our view that providing misleading answers to Departmental inquiries
and failing to openly disclose critical information violated the
spirit and intent of the requirement for Solyndra to report material
changes to its loan guarantee application to the Department,” the
report said.
So if Solyndra’s behavior was so outrageous, will its executives get
prosecuted?
No, because the U.S. Department of Justice decided earlier this year
not to pursue legal action.
Why not?
“The Department of Justice reviewed the evidence and elected to not
pursue charges based on the Federal Principles of Prosecution, which
include whether the person’s conduct constitutes a Federal offense
and whether the admissible evidence will be sufficient to obtain and
sustain a conviction,” DOJ spokesman Peter Carr said in an emailed
statement to the Washington Free Beacon.
As for Solyndra, its former CEO Chris Gronet released a statement
through his lawyer vehemently disputing the IG’s conclusions.
“There were no false or misleading statements by anyone at Solyndra,
and these so-called ‘findings’ were never supported by the
evidence,” attorney Miles Ehrlich said. “These exact same
allegations were investigated up, down, and sideways by three of the
most experienced and aggressive federal prosecutors offices in the
country — and each time they rejected this DOE spin as contrary to
the actual facts.”
“Solyndra executives were completely truthful and accurate in their
representations during this loan process, and the DOE was never
misled about Solyndra’s business or prospects,” Ehrlich said.
RELATED: Feds pour $32 billion more into solar industry
“For me, the bigger issue is that this is what happens when
government intervenes in the economy,” Boaz said. “If market forces
determine where money is invested in energy, then it will tend to be
invested in the places with the most likelihood of a positive
return.”
“If this happened during the (George) W. Bush administration, the
headlines are, ‘Bush’s Department of Energy Officials Make
Super-Incompetent Decision,’ ” Yeatman said. “But every single news
outlet runs with, ‘Solyndra Lies, It Was Solyndra’s Fault.’ The
evidence in the report clearly demonstrates … a gross dereliction of
due diligence and it’s awful convenient regarding the report’s
conclusion.”
Last week, Obama announced his administration will give $1 billion
in new loan guarantee authority to DOE support innovative solar
energy projects.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|