Iran
nuclear deal now backed by 31 senators
Send a link to a friend
[August 31, 2015]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senator
Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon, said on Sunday he would support
the nuclear deal with Iran, moving President Barack Obama a step closer
to having sufficient backing to ensure the deal stands.
|
"I believe the agreement, titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action (JCPOA), is the best available strategy to block Iran from
acquiring a nuclear weapon," Merkley wrote in a statement published
on Medium.com.
To read the statement, see (http://bit.ly/1PFmSwz)
Obama is trying to muster 34 votes in the Senate to ensure lawmakers
cannot kill the deal. Thirty-one senators, all Democrats and
independents who vote with Democrats, have now said they will
support it.
Congress must vote on the deal by Sept. 17. The following describes
how votes are likely to play out:
• When Congress returns on Sept. 8 from its August recess, debate
will begin on a Republican-sponsored "resolution of disapproval"
against the deal.
• In the Senate, Republicans must gather 60 votes to move the
resolution forward under Senate procedural rules. If they can, they
will then need a simple majority of 51 votes in the chamber to
approve the resolution. It would pass, because Republicans control a
majority of Senate seats and most have already come out against the
agreement.
• There is no similar procedural barrier in the House. The
resolution is expected to easily win approval there. Republicans
hold 246 seats in the 435-seat House.
• If both chambers approve the resolution, it would go to Obama's
desk for review. He has vowed to veto it.
• If he does so, opponents would then try to override the veto. This
would take a two-thirds majority vote in each chamber. The Senate
has 100 members; the House, 434, plus one vacant seat.
[to top of second column] |
• Democrats could block an override in the Senate with 34 votes. So
far, 31 senators have committed to voting in favor of the deal; 31
have said they will oppose it.
• In the House, if Republicans voted unanimously against the deal,
they would need to get at least 44 Democrats to vote with them to
override a veto.
• The Iran deal is not a treaty, so it does not need the two-thirds
vote in the Senate to be ratified. The "resolution of disapproval"
mechanism was included in a law Obama signed in May giving Congress
the right to weigh in on the nuclear deal with Iran.
• If Congress were to pass a resolution of disapproval and override
a veto, Obama would be barred from waiving most of the U.S.
sanctions imposed on Iran over its nuclear program. Proponents of
the agreement say this would kill the deal.
(Reporting by Alina Selyukh and Eric Walsh; Additional reporting by
Alex Wilts, Susan Cornwell and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Alison
Williams)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|