Pentagon
eyes proposal for M&A changes in 'weeks'
Send a link to a friend
[December 23, 2015]
By Andrea Shalal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon and
other U.S. government agencies should complete a legislative proposal in
coming weeks to let regulators block proposed mergers for national
security reasons, instead of just antitrust concerns, a top official
said on Tuesday.
|
Defense Undersecretary Frank Kendall, who oversees arms weapons
acquisitions and industrial base issues for the Pentagon, made the
comments in an interview, after first mentioning the legislative
push in September.
In September he raised concerns about further consolidation among
the biggest players in the U.S. weapons industry, warning that big
weapons makers were not hesitant to use the power that came with
increased size for their own corporate advantage.
The comments came days after the U.S. Justice Department approved
Lockheed Martin Corp's $9 billion takeover of Sikorsky Aircraft from
United Technologies Corp, one of the biggest acquisitions in the
weapons industry in years.
At the time, Kendall said the U.S. Justice Department cleared
Lockheed's acquisition of the helicopter maker because there was no
direct anti-competitive issue, but the Pentagon did not want to see
its industrial base whittled down to two or three very large
suppliers.
On Tuesday, Kendall said the Pentagon was working with the Justice
Department and other agencies on a proposal that would add a
national security provision to current law, much as mergers in other
industrial sectors are subject to a "public interest" provision
since they serve the nation.
He said the proposal should be wrapped up soon and sent to lawmakers
for their consideration.
Kendall said the prospects for getting the legislation passed in a
presidential election year were unclear, but it was important to
address the issue. "It's a debate we should have," he said.
[to top of second column] |
Pentagon officials have said that further consolidation among prime
contractors in the weapons industry could lead to higher costs,
decreased innovation and less competition.
Dozens of companies in the sector merged in the 1990s as military
spending fell sharply after the end of the Cold War. The changes
left five large contractors that dominate the market: Lockheed,
Boeing Co, Northrop Grumman Corp, General Dynamics Corp and Raytheon
Co.
Kendall said the Lockheed-Sikorsky deal would move a high percentage
of the military helicopter market into a company that already
dominates the U.S. fighter jet market as the prime contractor on the
$391 billion F-35 fighter jet program.
Lockheed said there was no evidence that larger defense companies
reduced competition or inhibit innovation.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Andrew Hay)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|