Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.

 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


http://www.lincolndailynews.com/images/frontpage/killebrew2.jpgTax and spend


By Jim Killebrew

Send a link to a friend  Share

[February 03, 2015]  President Obama has released his latest proposed budget. For the first time in American history the budget reached the sum of $4 trillion dollars. Of course it is no surprise the President's budget replays many of the components of his previously submitted budgets. There were $360 billion dollars of new taxes that creates lots more spending, and of course, bigger government. That is keeping with the President's belief that the larger the government control over the people the better off they will be.

The President is calling for an end to the sequestration budget caps that he had proposed a few years ago in 2011. His new budget is likely "dead on arrival" with the republican Congress, but it is purely a political budget that simply lays out the markers for the up-coming Presidential debate in 2016. If one looks closely to the currently presented budget, it seems obvious it mirrors the politics of the democrat senator from Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren.

If the President had his way there would be a minimum of $74 billion dollars in new spending. Even with those new, higher taxes calling for a mandatory 14% tax for corporations doing business in other countries, even though they are being taxed already in those countries, it would still not eliminate the deficit spending. The President's budget increases the capital gains tax up to 28%, from the current 15%. The President likes to make people believe it is only the "rich" people who would pay the capital gains tax. However, for each person in the country who has retirement funds tied to the stock market, such as 401 (k), would have to pay that increased tax as well. His new budget also raises taxes on the nation's largest banks as well. When those taxes are raised, the middle class pays for them proportionally just as much as the nation's wealthiest do.

The bottom line is the American people are paying more taxes than ever before. The new budget will continue to produce an annual deficit of $470 billion dollars. With an annual spending rate that will exceed $340 billion dollars along with the deficit spending he has called for, it will exceed the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expected at about 3% growth, it will amount to the American citizen supporting a large government that mandates personal spending in taxes at a marginal rate of approximately 67%. That is outrageous and unsustainable for the average, middle-class citizen. Compare this to the conditions Americans experienced in the infancy of the founding of our country. America's Revolutionary War broke out in April 1775. The British Empire had poked the people living in the thirteen colonies living across the Atlantic. Great Britain had treated the colonists as subjects of the King who needed to pay taxes from their sweat and toil without having anyone to represent their interests.

The battles throughout the Summer, Fall and Winter of 1775 had been met with some indifference by many of the colonists who had not yet worked up enough dissent to rebel against the King. Sentiments were changed, however, by Britain's tyranny and cruelty, along with the growing number of battles and emotions that were fueled by statements written in the paper, "Common Sense" by Thomas Payne.

Great Britain's King had exacted taxes unduly, the King's men were unjustly cruel. "Government by kings was first introduced into the world by the Heathens, from whom the children of Israel copied the custom. It was the most prosperous invention the Devil ever set on foot for the promotion of idolatry. The Heathens paid divine honors to their deceased kings, and the Christian world hath improved on the plan by doing the same to their living ones. How impious is the title of sacred majesty applied to a worm, who in the midst of his splendor is crumbling into dust!"

[to top of second column]

"As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture; for the will of the Almighty, as declared by Gideon and the prophet Samuel, expressly disapproves of government by kings. All anti-monarchial parts of scripture have been very smoothly glossed over in monarchial governments, but they undoubtedly merit the attention of countries which have their governments yet to form. Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's is the scriptural doctrine of courts, yet it is no support of monarchial government, for the Jews at that time were without a king, and in a state of vassalage to the Romans."

"Near three thousand years passed away from the Mosaic account of the creation, till the Jews under a national delusion requested a king. Till then their form of government (except in extraordinary cases, where the Almighty interposed) was a kind of republic administered by a judge and the elders of the tribes. Kings they had none, and it was held sinful to acknowledge any being under that title but the Lords of Hosts. And when a man seriously reflects on the idolatrous homage which is paid to the persons of kings he need not wonder, that the Almighty, ever jealous of his honor, should disapprove of a form of government which so impiously invades the prerogative of heaven."

"Monarchy is ranked in scripture as one of the sins of the Jews, for which a curse in reserve is denounced against them. The history of that transaction is worth attending to."
So, according to Payne, continuing with submission to the King of Great Britain was the same as participating in the sin the Israelites of old had perpetuated from "heathen" nations. The only answer was to sever ties and declare independence.

With the motivation from the "Common Sense" and the white-hot words of Thomas Payne ringing in their ears the Continental Congress met at what is now the Independence Hall in Philadelphia, the city of "Brotherly Love." Virginia's delegate Richard Henry Lee called for the colonies to demand independence from Great Britain. Throughout June the debate raged in the Congress no doubt recalling some of the battles and the unfairness of the taxation imposed by the King. With the persuasive words of Thomas Payne and others who wished for secession ringing in their ears, the Continental Congress called upon Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, John Adams of Massachusetts, Roger Sherman of Connecticut, Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania and Robert R. Livingston of New York to write and submit for consideration a draft statement that would serve as justification for secession of the colonies from Great Britain.

By July 2, 1776 the smaller committee from the Continental Congress had presented the Declaration of Independence, written primarily by Thomas Jefferson over a two day period, to the Continental Congress on July 2nd. The Congress voted for independence on that day, but on July 4, 1776 the Continental Congress formally adopted the Declaration of Independence as their singular voice to the Monarch of Great Britain they would no longer be subjects belonging to him. So, on July 4, 1776 Americans took a stand against tyranny and injustice.

Americans are going to have to re-study their history and determine if they continue to want to accept the unjustly demanded taxes of today or use their power of the Constitution and representative form of government to stand against the tyranny and injustice of out of control taxes and demand a more equalized tax process.

[By JIM KILLEBREW]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article.

 

< Recent commentaries

Back to top