| 
		U.S. derails amendment to toughen nuclear 
		safety pact: diplomats 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		[February 10, 2015] 
		By Shadia Nasralla
 VIENNA (Reuters) - The United States has 
		derailed a proposal to toughen nuclear safety standards by amending a 
		global atomic treaty, diplomats said, with opponents of the move arguing 
		it would get mired in lengthy parliamentary ratification.
 | 
			
            | 
			 Months of wrangling about the future of the 77-nation Convention 
			on Nuclear Safety (CNS) culminated at a Vienna meeting diplomats 
			feared could expose divisions over safety standards four years after 
			the Fukushima disaster in Japan. 
 Switzerland had put forward a proposal to amend the CNS, arguing 
			stricter standards could help avoid a repeat of Fukushima, where an 
			earthquake and tsunami sparked triple nuclear meltdowns, forced more 
			than 160,000 people to flee nearby towns and contaminated water, 
			food and air.
 
 But Russia and the United States opposed an amendment of the CNS, 
			diplomats told Reuters.
 
 The gathering approved a Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety on 
			Monday endorsing the main ideas of the proposed amendment, such as 
			refitting old nuclear plants and minimizing off-site contamination 
			in case of accidents.
   
			
			 But it does not create a piece of international law.
 Some opponents of amendments argued the lengthy process of pushing 
			them through national parliaments would run counter to the aim of 
			increasing safety standards quickly.
 
 Changing the convention itself to be more punishing could have been 
			off-putting for countries already reluctant to fully submit 
			themselves to peer reviews, some diplomats said.
 
 "The ratification process for an amendment would have distracted the 
			focus of the contracting parties to pursue full participation," one 
			senior U.S. official said.
 
 Critics of an amendment say U.S. industry has already spent billions 
			of dollars on improving nuclear safety since Fukushima.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			"Opposition was mainly politically motivated as it would have been 
			hardly possible for some countries to domestically ratify a changed 
			convention," Hans Wanner, head of the Swiss nuclear watchdog, said 
			in a statement posted on the internet.
 "Many countries also fear massive cost increases by committing to 
			refit older facilities," he said.
 
 Rafael Grossi, Argentina's ambassador in Vienna and head of the 
			conference, said that what might look like a weaker document to some 
			is a practicable solution to others. "We tried to concentrate on 
			what was achievable now," he told reporters.
 
 (Editing by Mark Heinrich)
 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |