| 
			 The Supreme Court earlier in the day cleared the way for Alabama 
			to become the 37th state where gay marriage is legal by refusing a 
			request by the state's Republican attorney general to keep weddings 
			on hold until it decides later this year whether laws banning gay 
			matrimony violate the U.S. Constitution. 
 But same-sex couples in more than 50 of Alabama's 67 counties 
			encountered difficulties in getting marriage licenses, gay rights 
			advocates said, with some counties refraining from issuing licenses 
			to gay couples and others shutting down their marriage license 
			operations altogether.
 
 This followed an order by Roy Moore, the conservative chief justice 
			of Alabama's Supreme Court, instructing probate judges to issue no 
			marriage licenses to gay couples despite a federal court ruling in 
			January throwing out the state's gay marriage ban, effective on 
			Monday.
 
 Moore's chief of staff said the directive still stood despite 
			Monday's U.S. Supreme Court action.
 
			
			   In Birmingham, dozens of same-sex couples married at the courthouse 
			and an adjacent park, where they were greeted by supporters 
			supplying cupcakes along with a handful of protesters bearing 
			crosses and Bibles.
 Wiping away tears, Eli Borges Wright, 28, said he was overjoyed to 
			be marrying the man he has been in a relationship with for seven 
			years. "After all of these years, I can finally say this is my 
			husband," he said.
 
 The scene contrasted to that in other parts of the state, from 
			Tuscaloosa, where gay couples were refused marriage licenses, to 
			Shelby County, where the marriage license department was shuttered.
 
 In Mobile, attorneys for gay couples filed a federal contempt motion 
			against Probate Judge Don Davis over the county's marriage license 
			division being shut, which was denied on technical grounds.
 
 'SOW CONFUSION'
 
 Ronald Krotoszynski, a constitutional law expert at the University 
			of Alabama School of Law, said state probate judges are obligated to 
			follow the federal ruling but that many likely fear losing their 
			elected judgeships by acceding too quickly.
 
 "It makes the courage of the judges that have followed the federal 
			order all the more remarkable," he said.
 
 Gay rights advocates were critical of judges hindering gay 
			marriages, and of Moore for provoking them.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
			"Justice Moore couched his order in a desire to create clarity, but 
			its only effect has been to sow confusion," said Adam Talbot, a 
			Human Rights Campaign spokesman.
 Moore is no stranger to controversy. In 2003, he was removed from 
			office after defying a federal order to take down a Ten Commandments 
			monument he had erected in the state's judicial building. He was 
			returned to his post by voters in 2012.
 
 U.S. District Court Judge Callie Granade, an appointee of President 
			George W. Bush, ruled in January that Alabama's same-sex marriage 
			prohibition was unconstitutional, putting her decision on hold until 
			Monday.
 
 Two of the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative justices, Clarence 
			Thomas and Antonin Scalia, dissented from the decision not to 
			further delay gay marriage in Alabama.
 
 In a dissenting opinion, Thomas wrote that the high court's actions 
			in allowing marriages to go ahead "may well be seen as a signal of 
			the court's intended resolution of that question."
 
			
			 
			In April, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in cases 
			concerning marriage restrictions in four states. A ruling, due by 
			the end of June, will determine whether the remaining 13 state bans 
			can remain intact.
 (Additional reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Writing by 
			Jonathan Kaminsky; Editing by Will Dunham, Grant McCool and Cynthia 
			Osterman)
 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |