|
 The state Supreme Court stopped the execution of Jerry William
Correll next week because the Supreme Court recently agreed to hear
a challenge some Oklahoma inmates brought against use of midazolam
hydrochloride as the first of three drugs used in lethal injections.
Florida uses essentially the same formula, the court said in a 5-2
ruling.
The state switched to midazolam as an anesthetic in 2013 when some
foreign drug manufacturers quit supplying other drugs previously
used in executions. The Department of Corrections said 11 lethal
injections have been carried out with midazolam in Florida since
then.
Florida courts have approved midazolam, but the nation’s highest
court agreed Jan. 23 to hear an appeal by 21 Oklahoma inmates in a
case citing prolonged executions and signs of pain reported in that
state, Arizona and Ohio.
Chief Justice Jorge Labarga wrote that if the nation’s highest court
rules in favor of the prisoners, “then Florida’s precedent approving
the use of midazolam and the current Florida three-drug protocol
will be subject to serious doubt as to its continued viability.”
Justices Charles Canady and Ricky Polston dissented, saying Florida
should proceed with Correll’s execution unless the U.S. Supreme
Court stays it. Canady wrote that a stay in another state does not
automatically require one in Florida, and that agreeing to review
Oklahoma’s use of the drug means the justices will forbid it.
Canady said Oklahoma agreed to postpone three pending executions,
while Florida has not agreed to suspend lethal injections. Correll,
scheduled to die Feb. 26, was the only Florida inmate with an active
death warrant.
[to top of second column] |
He also noted that lower federal courts have approved Oklahoma’s use
of the drug and said it is “purely speculative” whether the Supreme
Court will reverse them.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information
Center in Washington, said the Supreme Court appeal is a toss-up.
“They might affirm it,” Dieter said. “But it would be terrible to go
ahead with an execution when the person’s life or death depends
solely on his having a date between the Supreme Court agreeing to
hear the case and its decision in that case.”
Correll was convicted of the 1985 murders of his ex-wife,
five-year-old daughter and former mother-in-law and sister-in-law.
(Editing by David Adams, Bernard Orr)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
