| 
             
		Activists seek to put porn actor condom 
		requirement on California ballot 
			
   
            
			Send a link to a friend  
 
			
		[February 19, 2015] 
		By Michael Fleeman 
			
		LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Healthcare 
		activists critical of adult film industry practices are working to put a 
		measure before California voters next year to require porn actors to use 
		condoms during film production, expanding a Los Angeles County rule that 
		survived a legal challenge. 
             | 
        
        
            | 
             
			
			 The proposed ballot measure, aimed at protecting actors from 
			sexually transmitted diseases, would require film companies to be 
			licensed by the state and would impose fines of $70,000 for 
			offenders. It would also allow actors to sue producers who violate 
			the rule, supporters said on Wednesday. 
			 
			Under a final draft of the measure filed with the state on Tuesday, 
			film companies would have to post warning signs visible to 
			performers stating that California law requires condom use for "all 
			acts of vaginal or anal intercourse during the production of adult 
			films." 
			 
			"We're trying to protect both performers as well as those who would 
			interact with performers and keep everybody safer as a result of 
			safe sex,” said Bradley Hertz, an attorney for the Los Angeles-based 
			AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which is sponsoring the measure. 
			
			  
			Backers of the measure must obtain 365,880 signatures by September 
			to qualify it for the November 2016 ballot, and signature-gathering 
			may begin after a month-long comment period. 
			 
			The proposal is similar to a condom mandate approved by Los Angeles 
			County voters in 2012 and upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of 
			Appeals following objections by the adult film industry. 
			 
			The industry trade group, the Free Speech Coalition, opposes condom 
			requirements, saying they could drive film production underground or 
			to other states and that the industry’s own health protections are 
			effective. 
			 
			“The people in our industry are the most highly tested folks out 
			there. It’s much safer to be an adult performer than to be just a 
			single person out at the bars,” said Diane Duke, chief executive 
			officer of the Free Speech Coalition. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
				
			The coalition oversees testing of performers for HIV and maintains a 
			pass-fail database of about 6,000 people. It says there have been no 
			documented cases of HIV transmission in sex scenes by professional 
			actors in the database in over a decade. 
			 
			But in Nevada, health officials said last month they were 
			considering imposing regulations, similar to those on the books for 
			the state’s legal brothels, after two male performers tested 
			positive for HIV following a shoot there. The Free Speech Coalition 
			says those performers were not in its database. 
			 
			(Reporting by Michael Fleeman; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Eric 
			Beech) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			   |