| 
            
			 Too steady, perhaps. 
			 
			Since Sunday Newman, 50, is out of work. People inside and outside 
			the company say his abrupt departure reflected in part the board's 
			view that the 20-year company veteran was too conservative and 
			lacked a bold vision for a period of dramatic industry change that 
			began at the end of the last decade. 
			 
			Newman also had to contend with two members of the 12-member board 
			who represent activist investor Carl Icahn, who demanded a big 
			dividend increase in 2013 and then saw it slashed by 80 percent this 
			month in response to a sharp market downturn. 
			 
			Icahn did not return phone calls and Newman could not be reached. A 
			Transocean official declined to comment. 
			 
			It is not clear what investors such as Icahn might have in mind for 
			the company. 
			 
			For now, according to one banker and other sources, Transocean does 
			not appear to be a takeover target because it is too large to be 
			swallowed by nearly any one of its competitors. According to a 
			Transocean presentation, its fleet is about 25 percent larger than 
			its biggest rivals, Ensco Plc and Seadrill Ltd, which are also 
			grappling with the downturn. 
			
			  
			  
			Newcomers, the sources said, would also have trouble gaining entry 
			into the highly technical and risky world of offshore drilling. 
			 
			Transocean shares have fallen almost 80 percent since Newman took 
			over in March, 2010. By comparison, the PHLX Oil Services Index rose 
			1.5 percent in the same period. 
			 
			Some of the stock battering can be traced back to the fallout from 
			the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history caused by the deadly 
			explosion and sinking of its Deepwater Horizon rig leased for BP 
			Plc's Macondo well. 
			 
			Newman's departure and the dividend cut could also be seen as 
			casualties of a 50-percent slump in crude prices since mid-2014. 
			 
			However, Transocean current and former employees and analysts also 
			point to poor timing of some strategic moves and a slow response to 
			the onshore shale oil revolution that began six years ago and 
			overlapped with much of Newman's five-year term. 
			 
			Reeling from litigation over the BP well blowout, Transocean was 
			slow to build new rigs, failing to capture new business during an 
			upswing in prices and now left paying for unfinished rigs when crude 
			prices and lease rates are sharply down. 
			 
			During that time, the company, which built its reputation on 
			performing Herculean jobs, such as record-setting drilling in 12,000 
			feet of water to depths of 40,000 feet, began losing its edge to 
			smaller, nimbler rivals. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
  
			Under Newman, the Swiss-domiciled company took a long time to deal 
			with a vast oversupply of offshore rigs as a result of a rapid rise 
			in cheaper and more accessible U.S. shale oil drilling. 
			 
			Only in May 2014, just a month before oil prices began their slide, 
			Transocean said in a filing it planned to create a new entity to 
			later spin off eight of its units in the UK North Sea. That plan was 
			shelved in November. 
			 
			In January, the company said it had scrapped or would scrap 12 older 
			drilling units from the fleet of 71 units it owns or operates. 
			Analysts expect additional costly scrappings. 
			 
			It remains an open question within the company whether the board 
			will pick Newman's successor from within our look for a 
			"transformational" leader from outside, one source said. 
			"You do need somebody that can adapt to that new environment," said 
			Rob Desai, oilfield service analyst at Edward Jones in St. Louis. 
			 
			There is no easy fix. Transocean's fleet is already half the size it 
			was in 2010. And even more nimble rivals such as Atwood Oceanics 
			Inc, which has a fleet of around 14 units, have seen lease rates 
			come under pressure. 
			 
			In the short-term analysts say Transocean may need to tap loans or 
			issue shares as it faces nearly $2 billion in debt maturing in the 
			next 18 months, while investing to renew its fleet. 
			 
			"I think they are recapitalization candidate. So they are going to 
			be playing defense here for a while," said Bill Herbert, managing 
			director at Houston-based energy focused investment bank Simmons & 
			Company, which rates the stock underweight. 
			
			  
			At least one big investor is betting on a rebound in Transocean 
			shares. Soros Fund Management LLC, the hedge fund of George Soros, 
			bought a small stake of 149,000 shares of Transocean in the fourth 
			quarter, according to a securities filing.. 
			 
			(Additional reporting by Jennifer Ablan and Mike Stone in New York; 
			Editing by Tomasz Janowski) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |