Atlanta investment firm
sues SEC to challenge in-house judges
Send a link to a friend
[February 20, 2015]
By Suzanne Barlyn
(Reuters) - An Atlanta-based investment
advisory firm sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
Thursday over the use of internal administrative courts, challenging one
of the regulator's most effective post-financial crisis enforcement
tools.
|
Gray Financial Group Inc and its top two executives have been the
targets of an SEC investigation since at least August 2013,
according to a complaint they filed in U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia, but the agency has not yet filed a
formal enforcement case.
The firm, which manages almost $11 billion, received Wells notices
in 2014, an indication that the regulator reached a conclusion and
civil charges are imminent, the complaint said. It said SEC
officials have told Gray that it plans to file an administrative
proceeding.
Gray Financial's complaint takes issue with the SEC administrative
proceedings, arguing that they are unconstitutional because the U.S.
President is unable to remove administrative law judges, a violation
of his executive powers.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Feb/20/images/ads/current/gives_you_more_bch_040314.png)
The firm has asked the federal court to order the SEC to share
information about the proceedings, including how it selects and
hires its administrative judges. It also wants the court to halt any
future administrative case against the firm.
The SEC’s investigation of Gray Financial stemmed from whether the
firm complied with a 2012 Georgia law that allowed public pensions
to invest in alternative investments, such as private equity funds,
the complaint said. The firm advises retirement plans.
The SEC has been handling more enforcement cases in its
administrative court, instead of federal court, since the 2010 Dodd
Frank financial reform law empowered the regulator to seek financial
penalties against a broader array of defendants.
Many defense lawyers say administrative proceedings lack procedural
protections available in federal courts, such as the ability to take
depositions and spend more time gathering evidence. What is more,
there are no juries in administrative cases and the SEC’s own judges
hear the cases, the lawyers say.
[to top of second column] |
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Feb/20/images/ads/current/tourism_lda_021315.png)
“The SEC’s administrative proceeding process provides the SEC an
unfair home court advantage,” said Terry Weiss, a lawyer for
Greenberg Traurig LLP in Atlanta representing Gray Financial.
A spokesman for the SEC directed Reuters to a 2014 speech in which
SEC enforcement head Andrew Ceresney responded to criticisms about
administrative proceedings. The proceeding furthers “the balanced
and informed development of the federal securities laws, just as it
does in other specialized legal areas in which administrative
agencies function,” Ceresney said.
(Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn; Editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Feb/20/images/ads/current/business_directory_filler.png)
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Feb/20/images/ads/current/graue_preowned_021615.png) |