| 
            
			 Securities and Exchange Commission Democratic member Kara Stein 
			called for the reforms as part of a three-page dissent over a rule 
			change that paved the way for seven new exchange-traded funds from 
			AccuShares Investment Management LLC to list on the Nasdaq stock 
			market exchange. 
			 
			The ETFs use so-called "Paired Class Shares" to issue and redeem 
			shares of opposing share classes that move in opposite directions, 
			known as "Up Shares" and "Down Shares." 
			 
			Among the ETFs named are an industrial metals spot fund, a crude oil 
			spot fund, and a natural gas spot fund. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			The commission approved the rule change last week, with members 
			noting that exchange's proposal to list and trade the funds is 
			consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules 
			and regulations applicable to a national securities exchange. The 
			adoption of new listing standards specific to the Paired Class 
			Shares is necessary before the AccuShares funds can start trading. 
			 
			At the heart of Stein's concern is the complexity of the funds, 
			which would require investors to be extra vigilant in monitoring 
			their investments, and the potential harm to investors who may not 
			fully understand how the funds operate. 
			 
			But her concerns about the approval of new listing standards, which 
			will enable the funds to trade, extend beyond the AccuShares 
			decision alone and call for a more thorough review process for other 
			similarly risky and complex products. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
  
			"We need a more thoughtful, transparent, and fulsome review process 
			for these types of ETFs, even if it means disapproving proposed 
			rules changes until we get comfortable," with such products, Stein 
			wrote in the statement dated Monday. 
			She noted that a more rigorous review process is especially 
			necessary because making a rule change clears the path for other 
			"copycat" products to enter the market. 
			 
			Stein also called for gathering more public input during the review 
			process to better take into account broader market and systemic 
			impacts of new ETFs. 
			 
			"The Commission should be taking more affirmative steps to obtain 
			public comment and academic analysis in this space," she wrote. 
			 
			(Reporting by Ashley Lau in New York; Editing by Lisa Shumaker) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			
			   |