EU court rules against
Czech tax on carbon permits
Send a link to a friend
[February 26, 2015] By
Jan Lopatka
PRAGUE (Reuters) - A Czech tax imposed in
2011 and 2012 on carbon emission allowances granted to companies for
free breached a European Union directive, the European Union's Court of
Justice ruled on Thursday.
|
The ruling was made at the request of a Czech court which is
considering an appeal of an electricity producer, Sko-Energo,
against the tax, but a similar claim to get the gift tax back was
made by the country's biggest energy firm, CEZ.
Under the EU's Emissions Trading Directive, companies were awarded
at least 90 percent of each member state's permits for carbon
emissions for free in 2008-2012.
The court ruled the Czech tax, introduced in 2011 and set at 32
percent, was at odds with the directive in light of the 10 percent
ceiling for allocation of credits for money.
The government raised 7.4 billion crowns ($306 mln) in the period
which were meant to fund growing subsidies to solar plants.
"The Court observes that, in the light of the 10 percent ceiling on
the allocation of allowances for consideration, the directive
precludes not only the direct fixing of a price for the allocation
of emission allowances but also the subsequent levying of a charge
in respect of their allocation," the court ruling said.
"Consequently, the tax at issue, levied following the allocation of
the allowances, is incompatible with the directive to the extent
that it does not respect that ceiling; that is a matter for the
national court to determine."
The European court does not rule on the case itself, but interprets
EU law at the request of national judiciary. The Czech Supreme
Administrative Court is to rule on the dispute.
The Czech finance ministry said the legality of the tax would be
decided by the court.
[to top of second column] |
Electricity producer CEZ, 70 percent state-owned, said it had
followed Sko-Energo and claimed back 5.3 billion crowns in taxes it
paid on allowances it was given.
"CEZ understood the reasons why the state introduced this tax, but
under legal norms it must protect the firm's interests in a way that
shareholders are not damaged," CEZ spokeswoman Barbora Pulpanova
said.
"CEZ was therefore obliged, following the example of Sko-Energo, to
file a supplementary tax return in the past on the gift tax."
CEZ however said it did not presume at this point how the court's
ruling would be transponded into Czech law.
(Editing by David Evans)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|