|
 A baseball lifer, Selig was an owner at 35, buying the Seattle
Pilots and moving the team in 1970 to Milwaukee, renamed the
Brewers.(Four years earlier, the Milwaukee Braves had skipped town
for Atlanta.) After baseball owners in 1992 forced Fay Vincent out
as commissioner, Selig took over. Now 80, earnest and rumpled as
ever, he spoke to Reuters contributor David A. Kaplan from his
offices in Milwaukee. In a far-ranging conversation, they talked
about Cuba, Lincoln, steroids, labor relations, legacy, Pete Rose
and Shoeless Joe, and Derek Jeter. Edited excerpts:
REUTERS: So, what do you think now, some 22 years after your
predecessor Fay Vincent derisively proclaimed himself “the last
commissioner”?
SELIG: Yeah, he doesn’t do that as much as he used to, does he? I
wonder what he thinks now when he sees the game as it exists today.
CUBA AND BASEBALL
Q: Did President Obama’s decision on Cuba come as a shock?
A: I don’t know yet what it means, but yes….Like all businesses, we
are eager to hear what the change in policy means for our industry.
Q: You weren’t given any sense it was going to happen?
A: Oh, no, no.
Q: Have you heard from the Administration?
A: No, there’s no reason why we would.
 STATE OF THE GAME
Q: What do you know now that you didn’t know 20 years ago?
A: When I look back, I’m just stunned at how we hadn’t addressed our
problems, how the economic system was an anachronism.
Q: What have you come to learn about people?
A: If you’re going to change the system, you have to understand the
people. I’ve been through two or three generations of them.
Q: You’ve often told me you’re a student of history.
A: Well, I’ve talked a lot to Doris [Kearns Goodwin] about “Team of
Rivals.”
Q: So you’re Lincoln the baseball commissioner? [Laughter]
A: No, no, I’m not! [Laughter]
Q: But you’ve presumably come to know something about the qualities
of leadership.
A: I knew how unpopular the stuff was that I was doing in the 1990s.
Baseball’s a social institution. For any change you make, the public
and press and everybody fights – like reforming an economic system
that was stuck in Ebbets Field days.
Q: You mean revenue-sharing [whereby the richer teams give part of
their take to poorer teams]?
A: Exactly.
Q: But contraction also was on the table in 2001 – getting rid of
two teams outright.
A: It was discussed like a lot of things, but not nearly as
seriously as everybody thought.
Q: Do you regret any steps you took or didn’t take?
A: When I think of where we are, the answer is no. We were under $2
billion in revenue under “the last commissioner.” We now have the
extraordinarily successful BAM [Baseball Advanced Media, which is
the league’s Internet business, shared equally by the 30 teams]. We
have the [MLB] TV network; $450 million in revenue-sharing; more
competitive balance than ever. In the end, I got everything done I
wanted.
LABOR RELATIONS
Q: Might some of your successes happened because of the times,
regardless of who was sitting in your chair?
A: I’m a history buff, but I’m not sure I’d say that.
Q: Lincoln wouldn’t have been much of a president in 1856.
Circumstances can make the man.
A: Things were not about to happen in baseball. There wasn’t any
groundwork laid.
Q: After decades of work stoppages, didn’t relations between the
players union and the owners have to mature at some point?
A: Having gone through a lot of hell and travail, I have to tell
you: not much.
Q: One could argue the travails aren’t entirely over, right? There
were percolations of it last summer in disagreements over your
successor. [The new commissioner will be Rob Manfred, who for years
led management in negotiations with the union. Several owners
thought he’d been too soft.]
A: It’s a very political job. But I don’t read things that way.
TELEVISION AND BASEBALL
Q: I’ve heard smart critiques arguing baseball fixates on the luxe
crowd, as well as national TV, like for the World Series. Whereas it
might better focus on local and niche audiences - akin to the model
of the minor leagues.
A: There’s plenty of work to be done there. But people are paying us
a lot of money. And our local television ratings are outstanding.
Q: What about playing some World Series games in the afternoon, so
tomorrow’s generation of fans can watch?
A: I don’t agree…Let me tell you about a speech in 1958 by a sports
editor in Milwaukee, Oliver E. Kuechle. He declared baseball
moribund because it wasn’t attracting the younger generation. Here
we are, 56 years later, and baseball’s more popular than ever.
Q: And the TV numbers, like for the recent World Series, don’t cause
you worry?
A: They do not. Television has changed. When the World Series is on,
we have intense competition. But outside of the NFL, nobody rates as
highly as we do.
MISCREANTS OF THE GAME
Q: You and I talked some years ago about “Shoeless Joe” Jackson
[from the Black Sox Scandal of 1919]. Hall of Famers Ted Williams
and Bob Feller petitioned to reinstate him from baseball’s
“ineligible list,” so he’d be eligible for the Hall. You never
acted. Might you be issuing any last-minute pardons?
A: No, sir. He was a great player but there’s a lot of history
there.
Q: What about Pete Rose [ineligible since 1989]?
A: I have no comment on that at all.
Q: I don’t want to mislead readers in suggesting nothing’s going to
happen when it might.
A: You wouldn’t be misleading them.
Q: I have to ask you about an iconic TV image – when you were in the
stands witnessing Barry Bonds' record-tying 755th home run in 2007.
Your hands were in your pockets – was that conscious or accidental?
A: I guess you’re right – I’ve never said anything about that and
I’d really rather not.
Q: My sense is your reaction was a well-choreographed way to express
ambivalence. You were present, but no hands clapping.
A: Well...
Q: Am I a smart guy?
A: I don’t want to bring up all those old things. I want to leave in
peace and quiet.
[to top of second column]
|
THE STEROIDS AREA
Q: Would you like to see Bonds in the Hall someday?
A: That’s up to the baseball writers.
Q: But you’re still a baseball fan.
A: I know, David. But when it comes to the drug thing, I did
everything I could. We have the toughest drug-testing program in
America – a sport that used to have nothing. When it comes to that
other thing, there’s no sense in replowing ground.
Q: Let me ask you about human nature. Drug-testing certainly has
made advances in your sport. Why do you suppose any player still
cheats in the face of pretty good tests?
A: I don’t know.
Q: You and the players union and baseball generally have all been
blamed for sticking your heads in the sand for a long time. So, I'm
curious: Has the question about human nature at least occurred to
you?
A: Of course you think about it. But I’m really proud of what we’ve
achieved. This past year, we had 7,929 drug tests: There were two
positives for performance-enhancing drugs, and 10 for stimulants.
THE ROLE OF FORGIVENESS
Q: I ask you these questions because over time people and nations
undergo rapprochement. They don’t forget, but they forgive. What
about Marvin Miller, [the revolutionary head of the players union
from 1966 to 1982], who committed no offense other than infuriating
owners by leading the players into free agency?
A: No, and by the way, I’ve said Marvin should be in the Hall of
Fame.
Q: So why did Marvin – not long before he died [in 2012, at 95] –
tell me that if you wanted him in the Hall you would’ve made sure it
happened?
A: I am not on that committee [that picks non-player inductees].
Q: What about my question about rapprochement?
A: There are too many far more important things that have happened
in baseball.
Q: I guess it comes down to whether one might see Marvin’s induction
as healing a wound?
A: We’ve had 20 years of labor peace. I have a beautiful note on my
desk from Michael Weiner [the late head of the union] and his wife
who wrote me when I announced in October of 2013 I would retire
[Weiner died the following month]…I’m very proud of it. So, I don’t
know what wounds we’re talking about.
LEGACY, COSTAS AND LUPICA
Q: You’ve accomplished a lot. Yet it seems to me you’re the Rodney
Dangerfield of commissioners – you don’t quite get the respect.
A: In the ’90s it was tough. One of baseball’s indigenous
characteristics is that it’s resistant to change. Remember all the
hollering about the wild card? Oh my God.
Q: Some guy named [Bob] Costas?
A: I’ve been treated great in the last 10 or 15 years. Some of my
severest critics have become my greatest fans. Bob has even come
around on the wild card…[Columnist] Mike Lupica used to kill me. The
last 10 years, he’s been my most fervent admirer.
Q: It sounds like you care about your legacy.
A: We all do.
Q: What’s yours?
A: We’ve accomplished more change during the last 22 years than ever
before. But I’ll let you and Arthur Schlesinger Jr. and everybody
else decide my legacy.
Q: You’re kind to put us in that order. I’m not quite sure that’s
right, but then again he’s dead.
A: All right, then my friend Doris Kearns Goodwin.
Q: Biggest achievement as commissioner?
A: Changing the economic system. BAM, for example, is an
unbelievable story.
Q: Because of the revenue or because it even happened?
A: I got the owners to approve its creation, 30-0.
LOWEST MOMENT
Q: Harder question: What were the lows?
A: The cancellation of the ’94 World Series [because of a players
strike] was my saddest moment. Life is funny. We’d had seven work
stoppages. Yet heartbreaking as it was not to have the Series, maybe
we had to go through it to achieve labor peace.
Q: There was a salutary effect to canceling the World Series?
A: Possibly.
Q: Any favorite players from your tenure?
A: I’m in a position of having to be neutral, but I have great
regard for Derek Jeter. He’s everything a player should be on the
field, and more importantly, off.
Q: Will he be an owner someday?
A: I know he’d like to be, and I’d like to see it happen.
Q: He says he needs some more money.
A: Time will tell.
TOMORROW
Q: Still planning your memoirs?
A: Yes. [Goodwin may help him write it.]
Q: And you’ll continue to teach sports and law at Marquette?
A: And at the University of Wisconsin.
Q: What subject?
A: History, of course.
HOT DOGS AND HANK
Q: I must tell you a favorite parental memory: In 1999 I brought my
oldest son to the All-Star Game at Fenway Park – the one when all
the players gathered round Ted Williams on the mound before the
first pitch.
A: A great moment in my career.
Q: You were chatting with my son at a reception beforehand and
offered to introduce him to Hank Aaron, who was nearby.
A: My great friend.
Q: And my son, then 7, replied, “First, I want to get some of those
hot dogs over there!” You turned to me and said, “Now there’s a kid
who understands baseball.”
A: Exactly right.
(Reporting By David A. Kaplan; Editor: Hank Gilman)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
