Almost everyone expects the ECB to announce a full-fledged QE
program at its Thursday meeting; even French President Francois
Hollande, who told business leaders on Monday that sovereign bond
buying, long discussed, would become reality. Markets expect the ECB
to announce 600 billion euros in bond buying, according to a Reuters
poll, while economists are assigning a 90 percent probability to QE.
Press reports suggest that the bond buying may be delegated to
national central banks, rather than sitting on the ECB’s balance
sheet. This tactic in part is intended to blunt criticism of QE from
Germany and elsewhere and to dampen any suggestion that bond buying
amounts to direct government monetary financing by the ECB. While
perhaps offering a polite fiction that the euro project will
continue apace, the idea that the risks of QE might not be shared
among member states sends an unsettling message.
It is unclear if Greece would take part, a thorny issue given
speculation that its Sunday election will set the stage for
dickering over debt terms that could end in default or a euro zone
fracture.
Indeed while the markets look at the threat of deflation and a
recession in the euro zone and take QE as a given, opposition in
Germany from the Bundesbank and government is still real.
Many investors took last week’s shock decision by the Swiss National
Bank to drop its strict control of the euro/franc exchange rate as
confirmation that the ECB would deliver a forceful program, one
which would spur too much selling of the euro for the Swiss to
handle.
Indeed driving the euro lower is one of the points of QE, as is
driving risky assets like equities and corporate bonds higher. To
meet those goals, the ECB is going to have to deliver a clearly
enunciated, large and detailed plan.
With expectations high there is plenty of room for disappointment,
and with it a rally, rather than the hoped-for fall, in the euro and
fall in euro zone equities, all of which would be bad news for
growth.
“The foreign exchange market needs an ECB QE package in excess of
€500bln to be 'surprised', and there has been enough discussion both
about the likelihood of 'bad QE' (i.e. QE with risk-bearing at a
national rather than euro area level) to suggest that it will be
hard to find new euro-negative news on Thursday,” Societe Generale
strategist Kit Juckes wrote in a note to clients.
SAWING WITH A SCREWDRIVER
Beyond the issue of the size and composition of the program is
whether QE is the right tool for the job at hand. Using a very large
screwdriver to cut wood is only marginally more effective than using
a modest-sized one.
[to top of second column] |
For QE to work it needs to impact consumption via the wealth effect,
as those whose stocks and bonds are made more valuable spend some of
the proceeds. That’s almost certainly going to have a diminished
effect in Europe compared to the U.S., partly because of a lower
propensity to spend asset-based wealth and partly due to the very
real uncertainty felt by asset owners in places like Italy and
France. As for corporations, they are more likely to respond to
government reforms and stimulus than monetary policy. It is very
hard to see a capital expenditure boom on the back of QE.
And while QE will to a certain extent help corporations to borrow by
making bond markets more generous, it does nothing to rebuild
capital in the banking sector, upon which euro zone economic growth
remains highly dependent.
Finally, it must work by driving down the euro, making a euro rally
on Thursday bad news for the ECB.
Agreement and harmony over stimulus and reform would likely bring
better results than QE, both in the long and short term. In the euro
zone central banking is hard, but politics still harder.
The measure of the success of the enterprise, then, is dangerously
close to being delegated to financial markets, putting the ECB in a
position in which no sensible central bank ever wants to find
itself.
The Swiss about-face demonstrated that central bank promises are
highly conditional and power is limited, even where their ability to
print money is not in question.
The ECB on Thursday may extend and expand on that lesson.
(James Saft is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his
own)
(At the time of publication James Saft did not own any direct
investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an
owner indirectly as an investor in a fund. You can email him at
jamessaft@jamessaft.com and find more columns at http://blogs.reuters.com/james-saft)
(Editing by James Dalgleish)
[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |