Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


But isn’t $1.77 gas a good thing?

Send a link to a friend  Share

[January 21, 2015]  By Mark Lisheron
 
 An unsettling thought occurred to me the other night while I pumped $1.77-a-gallon gas into my beater 2006 Toyota Camry.

I recall it had something to do with the war in Iraq. Bush and his cabal, handmaidens of Big Oil, jacked up gas prices so high Americans would gladly grant them permission for a war to liberate a massive new supply.

“Blood for oil.” It was starting to come back to me. Then I went back to check and found that I was misremembering, as Bush had done on many occasions.

As early as two years into the war, Workers World, the website for workers and oppressed people of the world with an interest in uniting, noted that prices at the pump were continuing to climb.

“The invasion was not about “blood for oil” but something far more sinister,” according to Greg Palast, who credits himself for uncovering many of the great Bush administration conspiracies. “Blood for no oil. War to keep supply tight and send prices skyward.”



President Obama certainly did his part. Obama managed to end the excuse for high-priced oil by withdrawing from Iraq while gasoline prices pushed $4 a gallon for longer than they did under his predecessor.

How, then, I wondered, could these manipulators of presidents, these shadow topplers of nations, have allowed the worldwide price of a barrel of oil to slip below $50?

The short answer — and it’s a pretty pallid one, I admit — is the shale oil revolution. You would have thought Bush, whose family made its fortune in oil, or at least one of his fellow creatures of the oil monopolies would have seen this coming.

These monopolies went ahead heedlessly spending billions and billions of their own dollars to create and deploy technology that has once again made the United States the largest oil producing country in the world.

It’s hard to keep fixed on what nefarious motive these oiligarchs have for doing this while you’re doing the math at home. At the current price of gas, I am saving $711 a year over what I was paying less than six months ago.

Information company IHS estimates there are 252 million cars and light trucks on the road in the United States. If the owners of just half of them fill up as often as I do, I calculate about $90 billion more discretionary income for Americans in this coming year.

[to top of second column]

That is 90 bil right out of the vest pockets of those mustache-twirling Oil Can Harrys.

This might make those 100 million people and surely those oppressed folks over at Workers World happy. But I’m afraid it’s done nothing but make the people covering the oil business miserable.

Having come from a long career in newspapers I can tell you why. Good news doesn’t sell. Had Scottish philosopher Thomas Carlyle not been so obsessed with economists he would have dubbed the news business the dismal science.

The media doesn’t feel any need to explain why it’s different this time, or why Obama is or isn’t to blame, or take the time to explain the intricacies of international oil. Just as long as they can deliver the chaos.

The same people clever enough to play the world economy like a marionette just a few short years ago have now unwittingly given us panic and, maybe, doom, the press is now telling us. And shortchanging themselves in the bargain.

How dare we feel good about our paltry savings when international markets we couldn’t possibly understand are plummeting down Niagara Falls in an oil barrel?



Only one thing can save us from our greed, the first gas tax increase in 22 years. Once again our elected federal and state officials are stepping in to offer a better, more moral and patriotic way for us to spend our money.

And once again, there to support our politicians are the editorial boards of America’s major newspapers.

I’d suggest a conspiracy but, if my memory and the media serve, that went out with the Bush administration.

[This article courtesy of Watchdog.]

Click here to respond to the editor about this article

< Recent commentaries

Back to top