| The university’s Institute of Government and Public Affairs new report 
—“Apocalypse Now? The Consequences of Pay-Later Budgeting in Illinois” — says 
the current budget year’s deficit is on track for $6 billion. It projects next 
year’s budget shortfall will be $9 billion if nothing changes. 
 The report calls for “a combination of cuts in spending and increased revenue. 
These will be politically difficult and unpopular, and implementing them will 
require strong leadership and vision.”
 
 But not everyone sees it that way.
 
 State Rep. Joe Sosnowski, R-Rockford, said he’ll be hard pressed to agree to a 
tax increase of any type without first seeing every state agency examined and 
spending of all types reconsidered.
 
 “A couple of hundred million dollars here and there and, you know, it’s not long 
before we’re talking about real money,” he said, echoing the late U.S. Senator 
Everett Dirksen of Pekin.
 
 Sosnowski said however well intentioned, state agencies and most programs could 
be reduced without eliminating a safety net for the truly needy.
 
 But short of change in the size and nature of Illinois government, “If you 
continue to feed the beast, nothing is going to get better,” he said.
 
 The university report says, “Illinois citizens must reduce their expectations 
for the services that they can expect from government and be prepared to pay 
more for government now and in the future.”
 
 Newly elected Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner has been preaching a message of 
cutbacks, bettering the business climate and “shared sacrifice” to come.
 
 Rauner spokesman Lance Trover told Illinois News Network, “Governor Rauner has 
been saying for a long time that the budget is far worse than has been let on. 
Governor [Pat] Quinn left the state in dire financial shape. It is clear that we 
need to restructure state government if we are to get our state back on track 
for the next generation. Failure to enact fundamental reforms would cause the 
taxpayers to throw good money after bad and that can’t happen.
 
 Democrats who control the legislature haven’t publicly tangled with Rauner but 
instead point to two dates: Feb. 4 and Feb. 18, when Rauner is to present his 
state of the state and budget addresses.
 
 Some lawmakers are saying Rauner will have no choice but to make big cuts and 
look for new revenue, also generally known as new or increased taxes.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 But not everyone is willing to concede the governor must call for 
			new or higher taxes. They want a stripped down state government and 
			budget reform they say will grow Illinois economy and ultimately be 
			fairer to taxpayers. House Republican John Cabello of Machesney Park, said, “The 
			taxpayers are stretched as far as they can be stretched. Some are 
			being forced to choose between paying for medication or paying for 
			housing.”
 He added, “It’s our job to not keep going back to them and say, ‘We 
			just need a little bit more, because that little bit more just keeps 
			growing and growing and growing.”
 
 Rep. Ron Sandak, R-Downers Grove, is another voice calling for 
			leaner government. He said the General Assembly and governor have an 
			obligation to reduce the size and scope of state government.
 
 Additionally, he said, Illinois needs a reduction in overly heavy 
			business regulation to encourage investment and job growth.
 
 Only then, he said, can Springfield ask for more money.
 
 “This is a slow turn-around,” Sandak said. “This is going to take 
			time.”
 
 But it starts now, he added. “Tough votes are coming.”
 
 Tough votes are coming, said a ranking Democrat who works on budget 
			issues. But he also said the advocates for hard cuts have a 
			difficult task.
 
 Rep. Frank Mautino, D-Spring Valley, said $9 of every $10 from the 
			general fund — essentially the state’s checkbook — are committed to 
			four areas: education, healthcare, human services and public safety.
 
 “Nine out of every ten dollars are spoken for,” he said. “When you 
			look at debt reduction, paying down old bills, funding other 
			agencies, it becomes really, really difficult.”
 
            [This 
			article courtesy of
			
			
			Watchdog.] 
            
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |