| 
			
			 Romney's IRA found its way, indirectly, into a broader set of 
			retirement policy reforms unveiled in President Obama's State of the 
			Union proposals on Tuesday. 
 The president proposed scaling back the tax deductibility of 
			mega-IRAs to help pay for other changes designed to bolster middle 
			class retirement security. I found plenty to like in the proposals, 
			with one big exception: the failure to endorse a bold plan to expand 
			Social Security.
 
 Yes, that is just another idea with no chance in this Congress, but 
			Democrats should give it a strong embrace, especially in the wake of 
			the House's adoption of rules this month that could set the stage 
			for cuts in disability benefits.
 
 The administration signaled its general opposition to the House 
			plan, but has not spelled out its own.
 
 
			
			 
			Instead, Obama listed proposals, starting with "auto-IRAs," whereby 
			employers with more than 10 employees who have no retirement plans 
			of their own would be required to automatically enroll their workers 
			in an IRA. Workers could opt out, but automatic features in 401(k) 
			plans already have shown this kind of behavioral nudge will be a 
			winner. The president also proposed tax credits to offset the 
			start-up costs for businesses.
 
 The auto-IRA would be a more full version of the "myRA" accounts 
			already launched by the administration. Both are structured like 
			Roth IRAs, accepting post-tax contributions that accumulate toward 
			tax-free withdrawals in retirement. Both accounts take aim at a 
			critical problem - the lack of retirement savings among low-income 
			households.
 
 The president wants to offset the costs of auto-IRAs by capping 
			contributions to 401(k)s and IRAs. The cap would be determined using 
			a formula tied to current interest rates; currently, it would kick 
			in when balances hit $3.4 million. If rates rose, the cap would be 
			somewhat lower - for example, $2.7 million if rates rose to 
			historical norms.
 
 The argument here is that IRAs were never meant for such large 
			accumulations; the Government Accountability Office (GAO) looked 
			into mega-IRAs after the 2012 election, and reported back to 
			Congress that a small number of account holders had indeed amassed 
			very large balances, "likely by investing in assets unavailable to 
			most investors - initially valued very low and offering 
			disproportionately high potential investment returns if successful."
 
 The report estimated that 37,000 Americans have IRAs with balances 
			ranging from $3 million to $5 million; fewer than 10,000 had 
			balances over $5 million.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
 
			Finally, the White House proposed opening employer retirement plans 
			to more part-time workers. Currently, plan sponsors can exclude 
			employees working fewer than 1,000 hours per year, no matter how 
			long they have been with the company. The proposal would require 
			sponsors to open their plans to workers who have been with them for 
			at least 500 hours per year for three years. 
			These ideas might seem dead on arrival in the Republican-controlled 
			Congress. But the White House proposals add momentum to a growing 
			populist movement around the country to focus on middle class 
			retirement security.
 As noted here last week, Illinois just became the first state to 
			implement an innovative automatic retirement savings plan similar to 
			the auto-IRA, and more than half the states are considering similar 
			ideas.
 
 These savings programs are sensible ideas, but their impact will not 
			be huge. That is because the households they target lack the 
			resources to sock away enough money to generate accumulations that 
			can make a real difference at retirement.
 
 
			
			 
			Expanding Social Security offers a more sure, and efficient, path to 
			bolstering retirement security of lower-income households. If Obama 
			wants to go down in the history books as a strong supporter of the 
			middle class, he has got to start making the case for Social 
			Security expansion - and time is getting short.
 
 (Corrects day in second paragraph to Tuesday from Monday)
 
 (Editing by Beth Pinsker and Richard Chang)
 
			[© 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2014 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |