As
gasoline prices drop, Americans swing to favor oil
exports: Poll
Send a link to a friend
[January 29, 2015]
By Jonathan Leff
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Americans are more
likely than ever to favor easing a ban on exporting crude oil, so long
as it does not lead to higher gasoline prices that have recently sunk to
near $2 a gallon, according to a new Reuters-IPSOS poll.
|
In questions posed to more than 2,000 voting-age Americans earlier
this month, around 45 percent generally agreed that oil drillers
should be allowed to export domestic crude abroad, while just over
30 percent broadly disagreed. In September, supporters and opponents
were both at around 40 percent.
It was the first meaningful shift in opinion since Reuters-IPSOS
began polling on the issue in October 2013. In the previous three
surveys, respondents were generally split 50:50.
The poll does not explain why U.S. public sentiment has shifted.
However, several events in recent months may have moved the needle
on one of the nation's most pressing, if little-debated, energy
policy issues.
U.S. retail gasoline prices have halved to near $2 a gallon,
probably easing immediate anxiety over pump prices; a growing number
of public officials have spoken out in favor of exports, including
Obama advisors; and U.S. export regulators significantly eased
restrictions in December.
Signs of growing popular support for exports may encourage more
politicians to take a clear stand on the issue, although most
analysts do not expect significant action by either President Barack
Obama or Congress in the near future.
For politicians, who otherwise support free trade and energy
development, the biggest hurdle to rolling back legislation that
critics say is a relic from the 1970s seems to be fear of being
blamed if gasoline prices were to rise.
And indeed, American voters still remain largely opposed to exports
under that scenario. Only around 22 percent of voters would still
support exports if it meant higher gas prices, a figure barely
changed from the previous survey.
Lifting the ban will not be welcome for refiners, such as PBF Energy
Inc <PBF.N> and Alon USA Energy Inc <ALJ.N>, who have benefited from
cheaper domestic crude oil supplies.
Four refinery CEOs wrote to new Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee Chairwoman Lisa Murkowski this week to remind her that
replacing foreign crude with domestic shale oil had helped create
"thousands of long-term, good-paying jobs".
[to top of second column] |
MAINTAINING CREDIBILITY?
Over the past year, a host of studies from think-tanks and industry
groups has sought to debunk the idea that exporting crude could
inflate domestic pump prices. In fact, most say that easing the ban
would actually make gas prices cheaper by adding more crude oil to
the global market.
A growing number of officials - including some prominent Democrats -
have also called for action.
Fully lifting the ban is the "correct policy decision," Tom Donilon,
former National Security Advisor to President Barack Obama, said at
a forum held by Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy
last week.
"Lifting the ban will advance our economy, our energy future, and
our foreign policy and national security goals. It is the next step
in leveraging our energy posture to protect and to enhance U.S.
leadership for years to come."
At the same event, former State Department official Carlos Pascual
said the ban was hurting Washington's credibility on the
international stage, particularly on related issues such as free
trade, sanctions on Iran and even climate change.
"If the basic point is to say to countries that we have to (work)
together to put global interests and concerns above short-term
domestic action," Pascual said. "The only way to maintain
credibility is if you do it yourself."
(Editing by Tomasz Janowski)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|