The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Golf Channel's
request to vacate its March 12 ruling and instead ask the Texas
Supreme Court to address a disputed question of state law.
Golf Channel, owned by Comcast Corp, had argued that it acted in
good faith in receiving the $5.9 million, and in exchange
offered sufficient value to Stanford in the form of advertising.
The 5th Circuit asked the Texas Supreme Court to explain what
showing of "value" would suffice under the state's Uniform
Fraudulent Transfer Act, such that Golf Channel might avoid
having to repay the $5.9 million to Ralph Janvey, the
court-appointed receiver for Stanford's companies.
Stanford, who is serving a 110-year prison term, has appealed
his conviction. Prosecutors said he ran a $7.2 billion Ponzi
scheme centered on fraudulent certificates of deposit from his
Antigua-based Stanford International Bank.
The case is Janvey v. Golf Channel Inc, 5th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals, No. 13-11305.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, editing by G Crosse)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|