NASCAR tries to engineer more excitement

Send a link to a friend  Share

[July 17, 2015]  By Jonathan Ingram, The Sports Xchange
 
 NASCAR tries to engineer more excitement
 
 Could NASCAR's current focus on engineering be the equivalent of the new eras in other major professional sports?

Major League Baseball has a legion of stars under the age of 25. Golf has a 26-and-under movement in the form of Jordan Spieth, Rory McIlroy and Rickie Fowler. And NASCAR suddenly has racing that is more exciting with side-by-side action and more overtaking.

Given that NASCAR has enough star personalities, there is a general consensus that NASCAR racing certainly needs more vitality -- a makeover consistent with what people look for in sports in general and get excited about in racing specifically. All of this comes down to the relatively boring subject of engineering -- even if the goal is more passion and excitement.

For much of the history of NASCAR, engineers were not welcome in a sport where self-taught mechanics ruled the roost. Once they arrived in numbers as TV money increased budgets during the 1990s, engineers were still eyed warily.

Dale Inman, the only crew chief to win eight Sprint Cup championships, has the classic attitude when it comes to old school vs. the new engineering school in NASCAR. "All these engineers," he said recently, "and not a single one of them has a train."

It is this attitude that made Richard Buck the right choice to become the Sprint Cup Series managing director in 2014. He was schooled by engineers as a chief mechanic and team manager for Roger Penske's IndyCar team, where he participated in five Indy 500 victories. Yet, Buck, who moved to NASCAR in 2000 with Robby Gordon's team, is a classic example of the self-taught racer. He understands both the engineering side and the old-school approach.

Eyebrows were raised last year when Buck replaced John Darby, who presided ably for 12 years as managing director of the Sprint Cup. In addition to video enforcement of the rules on pit road, NASCAR leaders clearly had an eye on making technical changes to the cars to generate more overtaking, and Buck had their confidence to oversee the garage. In the year before his appointment, Buck had directed the technical transition for the prototypes and GT cars in IMSA, which is owned by NASCAR. Before that, Buck had managed NASCAR's Touring Series.

A season and a half since his appointment, the confidence by NASCAR leadership has been justified with the midseason introduction of "lower downforce" versions of the Gen 6 cars. The race at Kentucky Speedway on Saturday night saw more overtaking and racing through the pack than anyone could remember in recent races on 1.5-mile tracks.

Next will come the "high downforce" experiment on the ovals in Indianapolis and Michigan. If they prove successful -- producing more drafting and overtaking due to a larger hole punched in the air with 9-inch spoilers -- then NASCAR could be on its way to better racing.

[to top of second column]

There was an excellent starting point for the new "low downforce" and "high downforce" packages that may yet give NASCAR a new image. The Chevy, Ford and Toyota versions of the Gen 6 cars introduced in 2013 were relatively equal and well-balanced. The new rules package introduced at the start of the 2015 season kept the cars balanced front to rear. From that point, a midseason adjustment has led to the "low downforce" package seen in Kentucky and the "high downforce" to follow. The only requirements are tweaks to the radiator pans, rear spoilers and front splitters -- plus tires.

Of all the partners involved in this year's technical transition, the most conservative has been Goodyear. The tire company is understandably concerned about new technical rules resulting in embarrassing tire issues and blame for bad races. The company stuck with its relatively hard tire for Kentucky, which worked well. At Darlington on Sept. 6, it will introduce its relatively softer tire designed to accompany the "low downforce" package that will be used for the second time this season.

The burning question is whether NASCAR will introduce the "low downforce" package at any of its 1.5-mile tracks during the Chase for the Sprint Cup Championship this year. In this week's Goodyear test at Chicagoland Speedway, the mechanical grip needed for the "low downforce" package produced a lot of severely worn right-front tires.

Chicagoland is the first race in the Chase, and it remains to be seen whether Goodyear will produce a tire for use with the "low downforce" package or whether NASCAR, absent a special tire, has a plan B in mind.
 


Will NASCAR eventually get to a different set of rules for different track configurations once there has been ample testing with Goodyear? Thus far, the sanctioning body seems to have put in place a program where that is entirely possible.

Engineering is not as sexy as having a plethora of twenty-something stars. But given decreasing TV ratings, there's little downside to trying major technical tweaks -- as long as they do not create safety issues.

-----------------------------------------------

[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]

Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Back to top