| 
            
			
			 When it is - be that in two months or two years - the lessons from 
			Argentina are sure to be revisited. 
			 
			Argentina's $100 billion default in 2001 was the largest in history. 
			It yanked the peso from its peg to the dollar and resulted in a 75 
			percent devaluation. 
			 
			This shattered the economy. Real gross domestic product slumped 15 
			percent, inflation reached 40 percent, and household and business 
			finances were crippled. To this day, the government remains cut off 
			from international capital markets. 
			 
			But, with the aid of serendipitous global economic conditions, 
			Argentina's economy soon recovered. 
			 
			So severe has been the recession in Greece since 2008 and so great 
			are its debts, that some economists say Greece might be best served 
			also crashing out of its currency union. Could a new drachma, 50 
			percent cheaper than the euro, be the catalyst for recovery? 
			 
			"The parallels with Argentina are there. A broken banking system, an 
			unsustainable debt, and the need to restore and enhance 
			international competitiveness," said Barry Eichengreen, professor of 
			economics and political science at the University of California, 
			Berkeley. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			"But there are reasons to think that reintroduction of the drachma 
			and devaluation would do less for Greece than devaluation did for 
			Argentina. Greece is less open, it exports less," he said. 
			 
			The dollar's 30 percent rise over 1999-2001 made Argentina's exports 
			uncompetitive on global export markets, especially when set against 
			the currency collapse of neighbor and rival Brazil, and ultimately 
			forced the central bank to break the dollar peg. 
			 
			Greece's competitive problems are more deep-rooted. Not even the 40 
			percent collapse in wages since 2008 has lowered unit labor costs 
			sufficiently to kick-start exports. 
			 
			This begs the question, if an "internal" devaluation so large hasn't 
			made Greece more competitive or boosted activity, why would an 
			equally large "external" devaluation make any difference? 
			 
			After all, if there's no demand and limited capacity to boost 
			supply, it makes no difference to activity if a country's goods are 
			cheaper because of lower wages or a lower currency. 
			 
			Argentina, a major exporter of commodities, was lucky its currency 
			collapsed just as the global commodity boom was taking off. This 
			gave a huge positive terms-of-trade boost to domestic consumption 
			and a major lift to exports. 
			 
			"That's not going to be repeated for Greece," said Willem Buiter, 
			chief global economist at Citi and co-author of a report in 2012 
			which introduced the term 'Grexit'. 
			 
			"It is a much more closed economy, and it has absolutely no hope of 
			getting carried along on a tourism and shipping equivalent of 
			Argentina's global commodity super cycle." 
			 
			MIND THE OUTPUT GAP 
			 
			But recent history suggests large-scale devaluations often do 
			eventually get a pick-up in growth. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
  
			Russia's real GDP expanded by 40 percent in the five years following 
			the ruble's 75 percent devaluation in 1998, South Korea's grew by 30 
			percent in the five years following the won's 45 percent fall in 
			1997, and Argentina's grew by 25 percent. 
			 
			Similar but less pronounced trends were seen in Mexico, Malaysia and 
			Thailand following their respective devaluations in 1994, 1997 and 
			1997, according to Capital Economics. 
			 
			"You shouldn't downplay the negative shock in the first year after 
			devaluation. It would be big," said Andrew Kenningham at Capital 
			Economics. 
			 
			"But there would almost certainly be a period of very rapid growth 
			and recovery in employment. In Argentina, employment started growing 
			within the year, and that would probably happen in Greece." 
			 
			Also even if Greece were to leave the euro it would in all 
			likelihood stay in the European Union, meaning it would continue to 
			be a net recipient of financial aid. 
			But more importantly, its "output gap" - the difference between 
			actual and potential growth - could accelerate any rebound. 
			 
			The larger the output gap ahead of a major devaluation, the bigger 
			the recovery. And Greece's output gap is huge at around 13 percent, 
			the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development 
			calculates. 
			 
			Greece's economy showed tentative signs of stopping the rot last 
			year, but months of acrimonious negotiations over its bailout since 
			Syriza swept to power in January have plunged it back in recession. 
			 
			Debt as a proportion of the overall economy will nudge 200 percent, 
			according to the International Monetary Fund, and many observers 
			reckon it will never be paid back in full. 
			 
			Something has to give. 
			
			  
			 
			 
			"Years from now, will Europeans look back and say we extended the 
			bailout for Greece for too long?" said Mickey Levy, member of the 
			U.S. Shadow Open Market Committee and co-author of a 2012 paper 
			"Greece's predicament: Lessons from Argentina". 
			 
			(Editing by Jeremy Gaunt) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |