|
 The French data protection authority, the CNIL, in June ordered the
search engine group to de-list on request search results appearing
under a person's name from all its websites, including Google.com.
That stemmed from a ruling in May last year by the European Court of
Justice that European residents can ask search engines, such as
Google or Microsoft Corp's Bing, to delete results that turn up
under a search for their name when they are out of date, irrelevant
or inflammatory, the so-called right to be forgotten.
Google complied with the ruling and has since received more than a
quarter of a million removal requests, according to its transparency
report. It has accepted about 41 percent of them.
However, it has limited removals to its European websites, such as
Google.de in Germany or Google.fr in France, arguing that over 95
percent of searches made from Europe are done through local versions
of Google.
In a blog post on Thursday, the U.S. company said it believed no one
country should have the authority to control what content someone in
a second country can access.
"We've worked hard to implement the right to be forgotten ruling
thoughtfully and comprehensively in Europe, and we’ll continue to do
so," wrote Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy counsel. "But as
a matter of principle, therefore, we respectfully disagree with the
CNIL’s assertion of global authority on this issue and we have asked
the CNIL to withdraw its formal notice."
The CNIL said it would look into Google's appeal and decide whether
to accept it in two months.
In case of a rejection Google may face fines, albeit small compared
with the company's turnover.
[to top of second column] |
"We have taken note of Google's arguments which are partly of a
political nature. The CNIL, on the other hand, has relied on a
strictly legal reasoning," said a spokeswoman.
Google warned that applying the right to be forgotten globally would
trigger a "race to the bottom" where "the Internet would only be as
free as the world's least free place".
Its stance was upheld in February by a group of experts appointed by
the company to guide it on how to apply the landmark ruling.
"Global de-listing remains too controversial without an
international agreement," said Luciano Floridi, a professor at
Oxford University who was on the panel advising Google.
However, European regulators and some legal experts think Google
ought to apply the ruling globally as it is too easy to circumvent
it by switching from one version of Google to another.
(Editing by David Holmes and Mark Potter)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
