IOC
in no mood for risks, opts for Beijing's sure bet
Send a link to a friend
[July 31, 2015]
By Karolos Grohmann
KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - The choice of
Beijing as host of the 2022 Winter Olympics over Kazakhstan's Almaty was
a solid vote for the tried and tested, and the financial and
organizational security of China.
|
It will not be the picture postcard Winter Olympics with mountains
blanketed in deep white snow, but a fragmented Games split between
the sprawling capital city and two mountain venues almost an hour
away.
By contrast, Kazakhstan had promised a winter wonderland at the foot
of the Tian Shan mountains, but clearly, the IOC was in no mood for
any more risks.
China's pragmatic approach of using its experience from hosting the
2008 summer Games and many of the existing venues from those
Olympics, paid off as the IOC grapples with problems faced by other
Games organizations.
Four of the six initial 2022 Games bidders dropped out mid-race over
financial concerns or a lack of support, some scared off by the 2014
Sochi winter Olympics' $51 billion price tag.
The IOC had initially attempted to play down the problem saying two
good bids were left, before pushing through a string of reforms in
December aimed at making future bidding more attractive and the
Games themselves cheaper and a more lucrative prospect for host
cities.
ALARM BELLS
The withdrawal of Boston from the 2024 summer Games bid race earlier
this week triggered even more alarm bells among the IOC, with
president Thomas Bach visibly irritated by the further damage done
to his organization's prime product.
An angry attack on Boston and its "broken promises" on Wednesday
hinted at which way the 2022 decision would go, with the IOC
desperate for some stability.
With the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics racing to make up for lost
time after years of delays, the Pyeongchang 2018 winter Games only
now picking up speed and the Tokyo 2020 Games seeing stadium plans
binned, the fate of the 2022 Games destination had been sealed well
before the vote in the Malaysian capital.
As much as the IOC liked Almaty's compact concept which scored
points during a presentation in June, the Olympic leaders were not
prepared to go to the central Asian state where the economy largely
depends on fluctuating oil prices.
[to top of second column] |
Instead they wanted the solid yet unspectacular Beijing bid and the
comforting embrace of China, known for delivering on commitments to
the IOC, even if it meant sacrificing some or much of the atmosphere
of a winter sports destination.
Beijing is unlikely to be blanketed by snow, nor will the mountains
be covered by much of the white stuff when the athletes take to the
slopes and sliding centers in the mountains around Yanqing and
Zhangjiakou.
"There will be no snow next to the slopes. It will be brown, brown,
brown," one senior IOC member told Reuters of what conditions they
would encounter in Beijing.
But the IOC is guaranteed another hugely successful Olympics in
financial terms while also tapping into a growing Chinese middle
class eager to try out winter sports.
It was also willing to accept what looks certain to be a seven-year
barrage of questions and criticism over China's human rights record
if it meant delivery and execution of the Games would be guaranteed.
(Reporting by Karolos Grohmann; Editing by Ossian Shine)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|