The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, CFPB, unlike the NSA, operates with no
congressional oversight and with little public transparency, even as it demands
complete transparency from the businesses it targets.
As Brian Wise puts it, the rogue agency created under the Obama administration
to protect consumers now serves as “judge, jury, and executioner” in determining
winners and losers in U.S. business and consumption.
Wise is senior adviser to the U.S. Consumer Coalition, a free-market consumer
rights advocate. The coalition has documented hundreds of cases of abuse by
Operation Choke Point, an Obama initiative overseen by the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau that targets merchants, such as gun dealers and payday
lenders, who don’t fit into the administration’s idea of what an American
business should be.
“Literally, this agency can investigate, can enforce, and can make the judgment
against any individual company or individual citizen that they say is violating
the law,” Wise told Watchdog.org this week as the U.S. Senate passed a bill to
scale back the NSA’s sweeping surveillance of American phone records. President
Obama signed the bill into law a few hours later.
But reform of the shadowy Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been slow.
Even if Congress does come to terms, political observers say it’s unlikely Obama
will sign any reform bill of the agency that has his fingerprints and those on
the far-left wing all over it.
“These are threats (to consumers and businesses) that have been well thought out
by a very activist wing of the Democratic Party,” Wise said. “In order for them
to be stopped, Americans on both sides of the aisle need to stand up and say,
“This is not the America I believe in.’”
The record shows the NFPB has collected data from more than 85 percent of all
credit cards issued in the United States.
Last year, a congressional hearing found CFPB officials were working with the
Federal Housing Finance Agency to mine data on the 53 million residential
mortgages taken out by Americans since 1998.
The information collected goes beyond names. It also grabs individual’s Social
Security numbers, their race, religion, personal financial information, and even
the GPS coordinates of their homes, U.S. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, has said.
“A breach of this database could cause untold harm to consumers by the very
agency that purports to protect them.”
Richard Cordray, the agency’s director, has said CFPB is only collecting the
data to protect consumers from fraud and predatory lending practices, but Wise
and other critics say the tactics used have Big Brother written all over them.
[to top of second column] |
In many ways, Wise said, the consumer data mining project is
worse than the NSA’s surveillance program.
“The NSA only knows who you called and when you called them. The
CFPB potentially knows where every single dollar of your money has
been spent,” he said. “The CFPB can realistically know when your
wife is pregnant before you do. All the NSA would know is when you
called your wife last.”
Beyond the creepiness factor is the security risk such an
extensive data-collection campaign subjects consumers to.
At the congressional hearing, Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, asked
Cordray if he could “personally guarantee that the consumer
information is 100 percent secure?”
Cordray could not, although he said CFPB works to safeguard the
information it collects on Americans.
Neugebauer said it appeared the agency and the NSA are “in a contest
of who can collect the most information.”
The CFPB program doesn’t ask for consent, and consumers aren’t
allowed to opt-out.
During last year’s congressional hearing into the CFPB, Rep. Sean
Duffy, R-Wisconsin, asked Cordray if he would object to seeking
permission from consumers before the agency collects and monitors
their information.
“That would make it impossible to get the data,” Cordray said.
Wise said the spying program exceeds the CFPB’s statutory authority
in its demands for “huge” quantities of data “regarding individual
consumers’ financial transactions on an ongoing, real-time basis.”
While congressional members like Duffy have pushed for reforming the
agency, particularly in attempting to bring congressional oversight
to its budget, the pace of change has been slow.
Wise said it’s incumbent on Congress to move quickly, if members
don’t want the American people to know what they’re charging on
their personal credit cards.
“I would bet there’s a lot of congressmen out there that have some
line items on their credit cards they don’t want to be released to
public,” he said. “The way this administration protects data in this
country, I would bet that will be a prime moving target in the
future.”
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |