Court
declines to suspend U.S. net neutrality rules
Send a link to a friend
[June 12, 2015]
By Alina Selyukh
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New U.S. Internet
traffic regulations, known as net neutrality rules, will go into effect
on Friday after a federal appeals court rejected the telecommunications
industry's request to partly suspend their implementation while they are
being litigated.
|
The ruling on Thursday marked an early win for the Federal
Communications Commission, whose assertion of a broader enforcement
authority over Internet service providers is being challenged in
court by AT&T Inc <T.N> and cable and wireless industry groups.
In a short statement, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit declined to suspend the regulations and said that
"petitioners have not satisfied the stringent requirements," which
included proving irreparable harm from the rules' implementation.
The court's decision, which also put the lawsuit on an expedited
schedule, is the first step in the legal fight over the rules and
does not indicate how the court may ultimately rule on the merits of
the industry's challenge.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler praised the ruling as a victory for
consumers and innovators, adding: "Starting Friday, there will be a
referee on the field to keep the Internet fast, fair and open."
The new rules ban Internet providers from blocking and slowing down
access to websites and applications or striking deals with content
companies for priority delivery of traffic. The FCC will also be
able to address complaints about potential "unreasonable
interference" with consumers' access to the Web.
Telecom companies say they do not object to specific net neutrality
rules like no-blocking or no-throttling. They are fighting the legal
path the FCC chose to set the new regulations after the previous
version was struck down in court last year.
[to top of second column] |
AT&T and industry groups' lawsuit objects to the reclassification of
broadband Internet as a more heavily regulated telecommunications
service, and the new broad "unreasonable interference" general
conduct standard.
"The FCC and Congress have long agreed that this critical service,
which is fundamental to consumers' daily lives, should be lightly
regulated to continue the enormous investment and innovation that
has enabled the Internet-related economy to thrive," said USTelecom
President and Chief Executive Walter McCormick Jr.
AT&T referred Reuters to USTelecom and CTIA-The Wireless Association
for comment.
"The case is just beginning and the stakes are high," said CTIA
President and CEO Meredith Attwell Baker.
The case is U.S. Telecom Association, et al v. FCC, et al, U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 15-1063.
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|