Facebook
gaining ground on YouTube in video ads, report says
Send a link to a friend
[June 22, 2015]
By Eric Auchard and Leila Abboud
FRANKFURT/PARIS (Reuters) - Facebook is
gaining ground on Google's YouTube as an outlet for big companies to
market their products via online videos, the fastest growing category of
Internet ads, a report published on Monday said.
|
The competition for video viewers opens up a new front in the clash
between the two web giants that already compete in other types of
advertising given their appeal to young and international consumers,
Ampere Analysis said in a study.
London-based Ampere predicts a new advertising "arms race" between
the two rivals, neck and neck in terms of audience sizes with around
1.4 billion to 1.3 billion monthly active users, respectively for
Facebook and YouTube. That means consumers are likely to be forced
to see more ads, but also enjoy a richer range of video programming
as a result, it said.
The Internet will overtake TV advertising in 12 key markets,
representing 28 percent of global ad spending by 2017, separate
research by media-buying firm ZenithOptimedia said on Monday. Ad
spending is projected to reach $531 billion this year.
Online video is now growing faster than any other digital category
or subcategory, rising 33 percent in 2014, and is forecast to grow
29 percent a year through 2017, Zenith said.
The two reports were released as the week-long Cannes Lions
international advertising conference opens this week.
Ampere Analysis argues that Facebook is morphing from a platform
most advertisers use for building general brand awareness to one
that can deliver "pre-roll" advertisements that marketing companies
prefer for ensuring their messages are actually viewed.
Currently, YouTube remains a more flexible marketing platform,
offering advertisers the full range of video ads which run before,
during or after a video program is shown.
[to top of second column] |
"If the social network's own video ambitions are to be realized, and
if it is to convince content owners it is a viable alternative to
YouTube, it must deliver comparable returns," Ampere Research
Director Richard Broughton said.
Differences in ad formats translate into the rates the Internet
platforms can charge advertisers. While YouTube charges advertisers
when an advertisement has been viewed, Facebook offers the less
advertiser-friendly model of charging once three seconds of the
video have been delivered, Ampere noted.
Most content providers now use Facebook for branding and awareness
purposes, but trial revenue-sharing deals with the National Football
League and Fox Sports in the United States pose a serious challenger
to YouTube's lead, said Ampere, a research firm that serves media
companies and investment banks.
(Editing by Keith Weir)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|