IMF
to Fed: Drop the dots
Send a link to a friend
[June 26, 2015]
By Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Now that
International Monetary Fund head Christine Lagarde has told the Fed to
wait to raise interest rates, the IMF staff has followed up with
suggestions that the U.S. central bank remake its communications policy
and, in a phrase, ditch the dots.
|
The dot plot of interest rate projections issued by Fed officials
every three months is confusing, an IMF staff paper has concluded,
and should be replaced with a staff forecast of the interest rates
needed to achieve the Fed's goals of full employment and stable
inflation.
"It is not straightforward to connect the dots to get a coherent
vision of the path ahead," a team of IMF researchers wrote. The dots
"do not provide a clear picture of the Federal Open Market
Committee's majority view."
The dot plot shows the individual rate projections published
anonymously by Fed policymakers.
A more transparent forecast, prepared by staff and perhaps presented
at least as the majority view of the Fed's policy committee, would
make the central bank more effective and is "the main next step for
modifying the existing framework at the Fed," the IMF researchers
wrote.
In recommending that the Fed drop its dots, the IMF is wading into a
long and tortured debate.
The dots have plenty of critics for some of the very reasons the IMF
cites. It is hard to tell the majority view. Because the forecasts
are anonymous, they leave analysts guessing, for example, which dot
belongs to Chair Janet Yellen.
[to top of second column] |
A committee of the Fed is examining those and other communications
issues, but has not yet made recommendations.
Some policy makers have also suggested issuance of a staff forecast,
similar to what the European Central Bank produces, so that analysts
and the public have a clearer view of where the Fed thinks the
economy and rates are heading. Members of Congress have made similar
suggestions.
But the idea has always foundered at an institution whose various
members give different weight to different bits of data, have
different views on policy, and have a plethora of staff forecasts
and models volleying around the Washington-based board of governors
and 12 regional banks.
Rallying around one forecast, the IMF suggested, "would raise the
effectiveness of monetary policy."
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Leslie Adler)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |