Exclusive:
Obama defends lack of 'Plan B' for Obamacare court case
Send a link to a friend
[March 03, 2015]
By Roberta Rampton
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack
Obama on Monday said he thinks there is no "plausible legal basis" for
the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down a key plank of Obamacare,
defending his administration's lack of a contingency plan.
|
And he promised to rule on the Keystone XL pipeline before he leaves
office, although he would not say whether it will take him "weeks or
months" to determine whether the project is in the national
interest.
Obama touched on two main domestic policy issues during an interview
with Reuters.
On the Affordable Care Act, his signature policy achievement
commonly referred to as Obamacare, the Supreme Court is set to hear
oral arguments on Wednesday in the case known as King v. Burwell.
The case challenges wording in the 2010 law that could affect
whether residents in at least 34 U.S. states are eligible for
federal tax subsidies to help them buy insurance.
"Look, this should be a pretty straightforward case of statutory
interpretation," Obama said.
"If you look at the law, if you look at the testimony of those who
are involved in the law, including some of the opponents of the law,
the understanding was that people who joined a federal exchange were
going to be able to access tax credits just like if they went
through a state exchange," he said.
"There is, in our view, not a plausible legal basis for striking it
down," he said.
If the Supreme Court disagrees, Health and Human Services Secretary
Sylvia Burwell has told lawmakers that there are no contingency
plans to deal with the loss of subsidies.
"If they rule against us, we'll have to take a look at what our
options are. But I’m not going to anticipate that. I'm not going to
anticipate bad law," Obama told Reuters.
[to top of second column] |
On the Canada-to-Texas Keystone crude oil pipeline, which has been
in limbo for more than six years, Obama said a decision "will happen
before the end of my administration, definitely."
Asked whether it would take weeks or months, he answered with a
smile: "Weeks or months."
The TransCanada Corp pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels a day of
mostly Canadian oil sands crude.
Environmentalists have fought the pipeline because they argue it
will spur development of a fuel they say is more polluting than
other types of crude oil.
Energy industry officials argue that oil sands development is
destined to expand and blocking Keystone would do nothing to
discourage development.
(Reporting By Jeff Mason; Writing by Roberta Rampton, Valerie
Volcovici, Patrick Rucker; Editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|