Kerry said he responded with "utter disbelief" to an open letter
to Iran on Monday signed only by Republican senators that said any
deal would only last as long as U.S. President Barack Obama, a
Democrat, remains in office.
"When it says that Congress could actually modify the terms of an
agreement at any time is flat wrong," Kerry, who has been
negotiating a deal to rein in Iran's nuclear program in exchange for
easing sanctions, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "You
don't have the right to modify an agreement reached executive to
executive between leaders of a country."
But Sen. Rand Paul, a possible Republican presidential candidate in
2016, told Kerry that any deal would need approval by Congress if it
affected U.S. sanctions against Iran. Paul accused the Obama
administration of trying to bypass Congress.
"The letter was to Iran but it should've been cc' d to the White
House because the White House needs to understand that any agreement
that removes or changes legislation will have to be passed by us,"
the senator said.
The White House has described the letter as "reckless" and
"irresponsible," saying it interfered with efforts by six major
powers to negotiate with Iran and prevent it from building a bomb.
The negotiations, which resume in Lausanne, Switzerland, next week,
are at a critical juncture as the sides try to meet an end of March
target for an interim deal, with a final deal in June.
[to top of second column] |
"We have been clear from the beginning, we are not negotiating, a
quote, legally binding plan, we are negotiating a plan that will
have in it capacity for enforcement," Kerry said. "The letter
erroneously asserts this is a legally binding plan. It is not. We
don't even have diplomatic relations with Iran."
"It is incorrect when it says that Congress can actually modify
terms of an agreement at any time. That is flat wrong," Kerry said.
After the hearing Sen. Bob Corker, a Republican from Tennessee and
chairman of the committee, said: "I want to follow up a bit on what
he meant by that."
The letter was an unusual intervention by lawmakers into foreign
policy, which is mainly the responsibility of the president's
administration.
(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Doina Chiacu
and Grant McCool)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|