Jurors
to question woman at center of Silicon Valley discrimination suit
Send a link to a friend
[March 13, 2015]
By Dan Levine
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Jurors will have
an opportunity to pose their own questions on Friday to the ex-partner
who filed a sexual discrimination case against Kleiner Perkins Caufield
& Byers, which could reveal their impressions in the third week of
trial.
|
Ellen Pao has answered questions on the stand for the past four
days, saying a lawsuit was her only way to help women advance at the
venture capital firm. Kleiner, meanwhile, attempted to portray her
motivation behind the lawsuit as primarily financial.
The trial has helped sparked a broad discussion about gender in
Silicon Valley.
At least 37 states, including California, permit jurors to pose
their own questions in civil cases once the lawyers are done,
according to the American Judicature Society. Many states leave it
up to the trial judge to decide whether to do so.
For witnesses in the Pao case, San Francisco Superior Court Judge
Harold Kahn has asked jurors to submit questions to him in writing.
After conferring with the attorneys, Kahn reads them to the witness.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Mar/13/images/ads/current/weather_spotters_sda_022015.png) With just a few moments left before the end of the day on Thursday,
Kahn asked jurors if they had any questions for Pao. Presented with
a sheaf of queries, Kahn said court would take them up first thing
on Friday.
Kleiner is best known for backing Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc, and
other well-known technology companies.
Under questioning from her lawyer this week, Pao said that before
filing her lawsuit she implored fellow Kleiner partners to address
instances of unequal treatment for women at the firm.
In one email, Pao asked them to "imagine your wife or daughter in my
position."
[to top of second column] |
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Mar/13/images/ads/current/ccaonline_lda050208.png)
Pao rarely smiled during two days of cross examination, but she did
not become combative and acknowledged several statements that cast
her in an unflattering light.
Kleiner's attorney pointed out that Pao had hired an employment
lawyer and sought a 10-figure settlement from Kleiner before writing
a memo to colleagues at the firm about problems women faced at the
firm.
The case is Pao v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers LLC,
CGC-12-520719, in California Superior Court, in the County of San
Francisco.
(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2015/Mar/13/images/ads/current/st_claras_lda_082114.png) |