Views
of terminally-ill children should be heard: new UK guidelines
Send a link to a friend
[March 24, 2015]
By Kate Kelland
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain issued new
guidance on Tuesday for doctors treating severely or terminally ill
children, strongly advising that children's own views on whether they
want to live or die should be taken into account.
|
The guidelines, from Britain's Royal College of Paediatrics and
Child health, will be watched carefully around the world, experts
said, since Britain is one of the few countries to have a framework
to help doctors decide if and when to withdraw life-sustaining
treatment from a child.
"This is not an easy area of medicine. Sadly we can't save every
child's life," said Joe Brierley, a pediatric and neonatal intensive
care consultant at London's Great Ormond Street Hospital. "Other
countries are listening to what we're saying and following what
we're doing."
The guidance, drawn up by doctors, lawyers and medical ethicists,
advises for the first time that sick children as young as nine who
have little hope of a fulfilling life should be given more say about
whether their treatment should stop.
A child who has had many chemotherapy sessions, or a bone marrow or
organ transplant that has not gone well "will have more informed
views about continuing treatment than an adult facing such treatment
for the first time", the advice says.
Vi Larcher, a former consultant in pediatrics and ethics, and
co-author of the guidance, said it sought to address "an underlying
concern that we're doing too much for too many for too long".
Advances in medicine mean more and more babies are being born very
prematurely -- and some born as early as 22 weeks gestation are able
to survive. Older children with conditions such as severe head
injuries also have better survival chances thanks to medical
progress.
Yet the guidelines urge doctors to consider carefully whether
continuing treatment is always the right thing for a very sick
child.
[to top of second column] |
"For some, continuing life-sustaining treatment is simply prolonging
suffering in the face of the inevitable," said Simon Newell, a
neonatal consultant at Britain's Leeds General Infirmary.
"For (some) babies, no treatment is going to cure them and their
quality of life is non-existent," he told a briefing.
Previous guidance suggested that doctors should not resuscitate or
give intensive care to premature babies born at 22 weeks gestation
or less, and should only attempt treatment in babies born at 22 to
23 weeks if parents and other carers agree.
(Editing by Crispian Balmer)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|