Fidelity, whose 2.5 percent stake makes it DuPont's sixth largest
shareholder, has not publicly revealed what sort of compromise it
was seeking. Yet its unusual intervention as peacemaker could
influence other mutual fund investors in DuPont and pre-empt what
could be this year's biggest battle over board representation.
In a filing with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission last
Wednesday, Trian disclosed that on March 11 it received a call from
one of DuPont's largest stockholders encouraging Trian and the
company to resolve the proxy contest and avoid a costly and
disruptive conflict. It did not disclose the name of that investor,
but those familiar with the matter said it was Fidelity, the second
largest U.S. mutual fund company.
A Fidelity spokesman declined to comment. DuPont and Trian
reiterated their positions, but declined to comment on Fidelity's
involvement.
"Since 2009, DuPont has been executing a transformational strategy
that is delivering superior results," a DuPont spokeswoman said.
"In direct contrast, Trian has a singular, value-destructive agenda
to break up and add excessive debt to DuPont, which we believe would
put shareholder value at risk," she added.
A Trian spokeswoman rejected the criticism.
"We have met recently with many of DuPont's largest stockholders and
our ideas clearly resonate with them," she said. "We believe that
Trian's presence on the board will help to drive sales, margins, and
earnings growth at a company where EPS (earnings per share) is
expected to be lower in 2015 than in 2011 for the fourth year in a
row."
Trian, which owns a 2.7 percent stake in DuPont, is pushing for the
appointment of four of its own directors at the company's annual
shareholder meeting on May 13. The slate includes Trian's co-founder
and Chief Executive Officer Nelson Peltz, who has requested a seat
on the board since earlier this year.
DuPont, which has a market capitalization of $65 billion, named two
of its own nominees, Ed Breen and Jim Gallogly, as directors last
month. In an attempt to end the proxy war, the Wilmington,
Delaware-based company has said it is prepared to accept one of the
fund's nominees, but has refused to add Peltz to its board.
[to top of second column] |
DuPont had said it would spin off its performance chemicals
business. Peltz also wants the company to separate its volatile but
cash flow-strong materials businesses from its nutrition and health,
agriculture, and industrial biosciences divisions.
DuPont has rejected the proposal, stressing that keeping its
businesses together would allow the company to benefit from its
science platform, global scale, market access and brand.
SHAREHOLDERS DIVIDED
Over the past few weeks, both camps have been lobbying with DuPont's
top 30 to top 40 investors, the sources said.
A Reuters poll of investors who hold about 48 million DuPont shares
representing 5 percent of the company, found them split on Trian's
board representation.
"We bought DuPont before this happened, and we do think this is, at
minimum a distraction, at maximum a dislocation to the plan that is
in place," said Robert Zagunis, managing director of Jensen
Investment Management, which owns 1.8 million DuPont shares. "We
want this to be resolved, and with DuPont winning the proxy."
Others disagreed. "We think the board needs to make decisions in the
boardroom to maximize value. Trian brings one perspective for them,"
said Aeisha Mastagni, an investment officer for California State
Teachers' Retirement System, which held about 3.6 million shares as
of Feb. 28.
(Additional reporting by Tim McLaughlin in Boston; Editing by Greg
Roumeliotis and Tomasz Janowski)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |