Commentaries posted do not necessarily represent the opinion of LDN.
 Any opinions expressed are those of the writers.


Report: Majority of tax law violators at IRS don’t get fired
Send a link to a friend  Share

[May 07, 2015]  By M.D. Kittle | Wisconsin Watchdog
 
 MADISON, Wis. — Yes, some Internal Revenue Service employees don’t pay their taxes.

But nearly two-thirds of IRS employees who were willfully tax noncompliant between 2004 and 2013 and were supposed to have lost their jobs received a reprieve from the IRS commissioner, according to a newly released report from the IRS’ auditor.

Some of those employees received performance awards and promotions within a year after being disciplined, the report notes.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s review found 1,580 employees willfully tax noncompliant. Their infractions involved a range of violations.

AP file photo
AP file photo
TAX ADVANTAGE: A new audit shows 61 percent of IRS employees who violated tax laws had their terminations reduced to lesser disciplinary actions by the IRS commissioner.
IRS employees who commit certain acts of misconduct, including willful violations of tax law, are supposed to be fired, according to the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

“As the agency primarily responsible for administering Federal tax law, the IRS must ensure that its employees comply with the tax law in order to maintain the public’s confidence,” TIGTA notes in its audit.

The IRS commissioner may intervene and reduce the disciplinary action.

Doug Shulman and Mark W. Everson served as commissioners much of that time, with two interim commissioners named for a short term between their terms.

Over the 10-year period, 61 percent of IRS employees who willfully violated tax law had their terminations “mitigated to lesser penalties such as suspensions, reprimands, or counseling,” the audit found.

The remaining 620 employees, or 39 percent, were fired, resigned or retired.

TIGTA’s further review of 34 cases of willful tax violations found that employees with similar violations received different discipline.
 


[to top of second column]

“In cases that were mitigated, files included mitigating factors as well as evidence that violations of tax law were willful; however, the basis for the Commissioner’s decision to mitigate was not clearly identified in the case files,” the report states. “Some employees had significant and sometimes repeated tax noncompliance issues, and a history of other conduct issues.”

“Moreover, management had concluded that the employees were not credible. Nonetheless, the proposed terminations were mitigated by the IRS Commissioner. These cases included willful overstatement of expenses, claiming the First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit without buying a home, and repeated failure to file required Federal tax returns timely.”

TIGTA’s audit was drawn from the IRS Employee Tax Compliance Branch’s twice-yearly screening to identify potential employee tax noncompliance. More than 1,000 cases of potential violators are forwarded for further examination each year.

Granted, the numbers of violators are a fraction of about 90,000 employees.

“The IRS is committed to ensuring that employees meet their tax compliance responsibilities. It’s important to note that the IRS has a more than 99 percent tax compliance rate, the highest of any major federal agency,” the IRS said in a statement to Watchdog.
 


But the number of commissioner dispensations raises questions.

The IRS’ auditor recommends the IRS commissioner change how cases are handled and document the basis for any decision to mitigate employment termination.

The IRS agreed with the recommendation, according to TIGTA.

“The IRS also put in place new internal procedures to ensure that employees who have willfully failed to pay their taxes are now ineligible for performance awards,” the agency said.

“Nonetheless, the IRS agrees that we can improve this process. The changes will include a more proactive approach to ensure timeliness and consistency and provide more transparency in the mitigation process while preserving the Commissioner’s authority provided by federal law.”

Click here to respond to the editor about this article

< Recent commentaries

Back to top