Florida Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, is suing Obama’s Department of Health and
Human Services over plans to stop funding the state’s Low Income Pool program,
which compensates hospitals for seeing uninsured patients.
Almost immediately, Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republican Kansas Gov.
Sam Brownback announced they would join the suit against HHS.
Christie Herrera, senior fellow at Florida’s free-market Foundation for
Government Accountability, told Watchdog.org the Obama administration has
“awakened a sleeping giant.”
“They’ve raised the ire of all these other states that are in Florida’s exact
position, and that’s why you’ve seen Kansas and Texas filing amicus briefs in
the lawsuit,” Herrera said during a phone interview.
FGA and other critics of Obamacare expansion have warned states not to trust
promises of new federal funding — a point the Obama administration is
inadvertently driving home.
Florida’s LIP, like other Medicaid waiver programs, must be periodically
reauthorized by the federal government. The waiver system keeps states on a
short leash and makes any meaningful state control temporary.
Kansas, Texas and Tennessee will be at the mercy of HHS for the renewal of
similar programs for the uninsured and have not expanded Medicaid under
Obamacare.
Where Obamacare expansion is concerned, “the federal government needs Florida
more than Florida needs the federal government,” Herrera said.
“HHS has been trying so hard to land the big fish of Medicaid expansion like
Florida and Texas, the last thing they need to do is make those states mad and
join them together against Obamacare,” she explained. “That’s exactly what
they’ve done, and that’s why their plan has backfired.”
In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the feds could not coerce states into
the Obamacare expansion by threatening to cut off existing Medicaid funding.
Scott seeks to build on that ruling.
Scott campaigned against Obamacare expansion in 2010 and remained a vocal critic
after taking office, but he embraced the expansion early in 2013 before changing
positions again this spring.
“Sometimes you need a reminder that the federal government is not the most
trustworthy partner,” Herrera told Watchdog.org. “Governor Scott needed that
reminder, and that’s what he got.”
The LIP program, a product of Florida’s 2005 Medicaid reforms, costs far less
than Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid to able-bodied, working-age childless
adults would.
[to top of second column] |
In 2012, the left-leaning Urban Institute projected Obamacare
expansion in Florida would cost taxpayers $82 billion over 10 years.
The LIP program costs roughly $2 billion per year.
The Florida Senate’s “Florida Health Insurance Affordability
Exchange” Obamacare expansion plan is opposed by the Florida House
but supported by Florida Chamber of Commerce campaign A Healthy
Florida Works.
The Chamber sees the promise of billions per year in Obamacare
money as a way to create jobs and improve workers’ health. The same
arguments have been made in other states, where expansion costs are
already blasting past projections.
Jennifer Fennell, a spokeswoman for A Healthy Florida Works,
explained the group’s position in an email to Watchdog.org.
“From a business perspective, it makes more sense to pay less on the
front end for preventative care and management of chronic conditions
than paying much more for emergency room visits and hospital stays
on the back end,” Fennell said.
This is another argument used successfully in other states, but
emergency room utilization has increased as Obamacare expansion has
added millions of Americans to the Medicaid rolls in the past 16
months.
“The Florida Senate took a bipartisan approach to finding a solution
for both LIP funding and extending coverage,” Fennell added. “It is
possible to look past the politics and the rhetoric just as the
Florida Senate has and do what is best for the people of the state
of Florida.”
The Florida Senate’s Obamacare expansion plan “is not an expansion
of traditional Medicaid,” she said.
Fennell noted the plan includes premiums, job training and education
requirements for enrollees — but these provisions would require
federal waivers, just like the LIP program that’s being defunded by
the Obama administration.
Herrera predicted by the end of June state lawmakers “will come to
an agreement on the budget without LIP funding, and then the federal
government will have lost its biggest bargaining chip for
Obamacare.”
“I think people are starting to see that it’s not the little guy
pushing Obamacare in Florida. It’s big hospitals, big business, big
insurance companies,” she concluded, pointing to a SaintPetersBlog
story about state senators’ ties to the health-care industry.
The Obama administration had hoped states resisting Medicaid
expansion would fall like dominoes. But, combined with nationwide
spending and emergency room data, threats to existing Medicaid
waivers are solidifying Obamacare opposition.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |