Gastric bypass helps
treat diabetes, but has risks
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2015] By
Kathryn Doyle
(Reuters Health) - Two years after surgery,
people who have had gastric bypass have better control of their type 2
diabetes than people who did not, but also had higher risk of infections
and bone fractures, according to a new international study.
|
“Some doctors had thought that gastric bypass could cure diabetes,
but that did not happen for most of our patients,” said coauthor Dr.
Charles J. Billington. “Also unexpected was the extent of
complications in the bypass patients,” said Billington, of the
endocrinology and diabetes division at the University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis.
“Gastric bypass now appears to have less strong positives and more
worrisome negatives than previously thought,” he told Reuters Health
by email.
The results are based on two years of the ongoing Diabetes Surgery
Study.
Between 2008 and 2011, researchers recruited 120 obese patients aged
30 to 67 years old with type 2 diabetes at three teaching hospitals
in the U.S. and one in Taiwan. They were randomly divided into two
groups: lifestyle and medical diabetes management, or lifestyle and
medical management in addition to gastric bypass surgery.
The lifestyle group met regularly with a dietitian or nurse, were
instructed to weigh themselves and record their food intake daily
while ramping up daily exercise to a goal of 325 minutes of
activity, like walking, per week. They also met with an
endocrinologist and took medicines for blood sugar control,
cholesterol and blood pressure as needed.
The gastric bypass group had access to the same resources in
addition to weight-loss surgery.
Two years after surgery, 24 of the patients in the gastric bypass
group achieved lower HbA1c, as well as lower low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol and lower blood pressure. Together these indicated
improved diabetes control, relative to eight patients in the
comparison group.
There were eight infections in the gastric bypass group, compared to
four in the comparison group, and the bypass group had seven serious
falls with five fractures compared to three serious falls and one
fracture in the comparison group, as reported in The Lancet Diabetes
and Endocrinology. All the fractures happened among women.
Nutritional deficiencies of iron, calcium and vitamin D were more
common in the gastric bypass group.
[to top of second column] |
“I assume nutritional deficiencies are likely to be an even greater
problem in general practice,” said Markku Peltonen of the National
Institute for Health and Welfare in Helsinki, Finland, who wrote an
editorial accompanying the new results.
Gastric bypass may reduce bone strength because of reduced calcium
absorption from food, Billington said. “Supplements need to be
adjusted to be sure they are enough,” he said.
Carefully taking nutritional supplements, regularly checking with
your doctor about the adequacy of these supplements, and maintaining
physical fitness reduces the risk of adverse events, he said.
“We are still not sure which are the best patients with diabetes to
consider for gastric bypass or other bariatric surgery,” Billington
said. Hopefully this and other studies will help identify which
patients are best suited for gastric bypass to treat diabetes, he
said.
“It is important that patients understand that bariatric surgery has
other consequences beside the weight loss itself,” Peltonen said.
“Realistic expectations about the effects of surgery, acknowledging
the possibility of adverse events, and the need for continuous
monitoring of patients after surgery needs to be discussed with the
patients.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1GqY9KX http://bit.ly/1dlUZNx
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015.
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|