|
 Their apparent answer: calling time on a 40-year-old federal ban
on crude oil exports and using the newfound energy bounty to
strategic advantage.
"We've got an abundance of supply," Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker
said this week in Oklahoma at a gathering of putative Republican
candidates for next year's presidential election. Lifting the ban,
he said, would allow exports to "our allies in Europe, where,
instead of being dependent on (President) Vladimir Putin and the
Russians, they could be dependent on Americans."
President Barack Obama's administration has allowed small exceptions
but has said it will not open the door to crude exports as long as
the United States is still importing some oil. Even the
Republican-led Congress has been reluctant to push too quickly for
an end to the export ban, fearing political repercussions should gas
prices spike in the aftermath.
But several in the ranks of Republican presidential candidates or
likely candidates are warming to the idea. Walker's call was echoed
by others in Oklahoma, where powerful oil and gas interests want the
ban lifted.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who has yet to formally declare,
said exports would lead to "a more peaceful, more stable world when
other countries are not relying on Iran and Russia for their oil."
And former Texas Governor Rick Perry called for faster approval of
liquefied natural gas exports, vowing to "flood Europe" with it if
elected president.
That kind of talk upends the past politics of energy scarcity,
perhaps most famously expressed by the "drill, baby, drill" mantra
of the Republicans' 2008 vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin.
Drilling in Alaska and off-shore waters was seen as a way to boost
America's fossil-fuel reserves and curb dependency on foreign oil.
But that was before the advent of widespread hydraulic fracturing -
the drilling process known as fracking - unlocked new domestic oil
and gas reserves.
The boom in U.S. supply disrupted global oil markets, spawning a
sharp decline in prices and lowering gasoline costs at home. The
emergence of energy abundance - presided over by a Democratic
president who embraced fracking - left Republicans seeking a new
cudgel to carve out distinction on energy policy.
[to top of second column] |
The notion of ending the export ban found a receptive audience in
Oklahoma.
"That scarcity mentality is a product of the ancient past," Larry
Nichols, chairman of Devon Energy Corp told the crowd, saying it was
time to "get rid of that silly export ban." Harold Hamm, CEO of
Continental Resources Inc, called lifting the ban a "no-brainer."
Proponents argue that crude exports would be an oil and gas job
creator. Low prices have forced the industry to scale back drilling
projects and lay off workers but an overseas market would allow it
to ramp up production, a point made by Louisiana Governor Bobby
Jindal, who is also a prospective presidential candidate.
Still, the move carries some risks.
Oil refiners oppose lifting the ban because it keeps the domestic
crude oil they buy at low prices.
And there is a lingering nervousness in Congress that lifting the
ban could trigger a backlash from the public if gas prices spike.
Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a declared candidate, proposed lifting
the ban earlier this year but pulled his measure before it could be
voted upon.
"You open up exports, gas prices go up, and then Congress gets the
blame," said Rachel Pierson, an analyst with Beacon Policy advisers
in Washington.
(Reporting by James Oliphant; Editing by Bruce Wallace and Frances
Kerry)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
