The Rauner administration in July used rule-making powers to toughen eligibility
standards for the program, which helps low-income families pay for childcare.
The administration changed the maximum-income standards from 185 percent of the
federal poverty level to 50 percent of the poverty level, or from about $2,450
for a two-person family to about $665.
The House sponsor of a bill to roll back the rule changes, Democrat Jehan Gordon
Booth of Peoria, said the administration’s actions eliminated child care
assistance for up to 90 percent of those previously eligible.
State Sen. Toi Hutchinson said the administration’s changes would mean a parent
who works full-time at minimum wage now makes too much to qualify for the
program.
Hutchison’s legislation, Senate Bill 570, aimed at overturning the changes
passed the Senate by a 37-to-7 vote in August.
In the House, Democrats in early September came up within a vote of passing the
measure before delaying a final to keep the bill alive.
Democrats are expected to make another run at passing the bill, perhaps on
Tuesday, and Rauner’s administration is staunchly opposed.
The legislation “permanently cements the eligibility level for the CCAP,
regardless of appropriations or funds available,” two top Rauner officials wrote
to legislators this week.
“That’s irresponsible to the budgeting process and the type of policy that
created our backlog of unpaid bills. No serious legislator who cares about
passing truly balanced budgets can honestly vote for this type of policy — it is
a green light to create higher deficits,” wrote James Dima and
Tim Nuding, the governor’s human services secretary and budget director,
respectively.
[to top of second column] |
Were the bill to take effect in January 2016, it would add $220
million in costs for the remainder of this fiscal year and mean an
annual cost of $800 million, the governor’s staff says.
The bottom line, according to Dima and Nuding: “A vote for SB 570
is a vote to increase the budget deficit and force a massive tax
increase on the people of Illinois.”
Backers of the legislation were impressed by neither the Rauner
team’s argument nor its numbers.
What “is the baseline for the annualized costs? The pre-cut levels?
The post-cut levels?” Emily Miller of Voices for Illinois Children
asked in a letter on behalf of a coalition of child care advocates
and posted on the Capitol Fax blog.
“These are questions advocates do not know the answers to, and since
we are unwilling to make numbers up, we are unable to refute the
governor’s claims as a result,” she said.
“What we do know is that while the legislation would require
restoring funding for the operation of the child care program, the
cost of not funding the program is far greater than $220 million, or
even $800 million,” Miller wrote.
The coalition concludes, “No serious policymaker can honestly say
investing in quality childcare for working parents doesn’t save the
state money in the short-and long-term.”
The bill would need 71 votes for passage, meaning if no Republicans
break ranks to support the measure, House Democrats will need all of
their members present and on board if they are to pass the
legislation.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|