File this one under “do as I say, not as I do” — a hallmark of most socialist 
policies, when you think about it — because Sanders, the socialist seeking the 
Democratic Party’s nod for president in 2016, always takes Uber instead of a 
taxi. 
 
Literally. Always. 
 
National Journal published an analysis Wednesday that examines how the 
presidential candidates in the two major parties spend their campaign cash on 
things like hotels and taxis. While most candidates use Uber more than taxis to 
get around, Sanders was one of only a few candidates to report using Uber 100 
percent of the time when he or his campaign staff need a ride. 
 
Martin O’ Malley, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry and Scott Walker are the other 
candidates who used Uber 100 percent of the time, according to National Journal. 
 
  
 
Overall, candidates have reported spending $34,900 on Uber — that’s 75 percent 
of all spending on taxi and ride-sharing. 
 
Hillary Clinton, whom Sanders is chasing for the Democratic nomination, is one 
of only two candidates — Mike Huckabee is the other — to report more spending on 
taxis than on Uber, according to the analysis. 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  That’s funny, because Sanders has been far more outspoken than 
			Clinton about the ride-sharing app. He’s blasted Uber as an 
			unregulated corporation that’s destroying jobs and forcing workers 
			to accept lower wages. 
			In an August interview with Bloomberg, Sanders said he has 
			“serious problems” with Uber because the company is “unregulated.” 
			 
			A spokesman for Uber later pointed out, to The Hill newspaper, that 
			Uber is in fact subject to regulations in 54 different jurisdictions 
			within the United States. 
			 
			For what it’s worth, Clinton has also voiced support for changing 
			regulations on ride-sharing services like Uber. 
			 
			“I’ll crack down on bosses who exploit employees by misclassifying 
			them as contractors,” she said in July, a pointed reference to an 
			ongoing legal battle in California, where some Uber workers are 
			challenging their status as contractors. 
			 
			The California Labor Commission in June ruled the woman who filed 
			the lawsuit must be considered an employee of Uber, which, if 
			applied broadly, would wreck the business model for Uber and other 
			businesses in the sharing economy. 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			
			  
			 |