File this one under “do as I say, not as I do” — a hallmark of most socialist
policies, when you think about it — because Sanders, the socialist seeking the
Democratic Party’s nod for president in 2016, always takes Uber instead of a
taxi.
Literally. Always.
National Journal published an analysis Wednesday that examines how the
presidential candidates in the two major parties spend their campaign cash on
things like hotels and taxis. While most candidates use Uber more than taxis to
get around, Sanders was one of only a few candidates to report using Uber 100
percent of the time when he or his campaign staff need a ride.
Martin O’ Malley, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry and Scott Walker are the other
candidates who used Uber 100 percent of the time, according to National Journal.
Overall, candidates have reported spending $34,900 on Uber — that’s 75 percent
of all spending on taxi and ride-sharing.
Hillary Clinton, whom Sanders is chasing for the Democratic nomination, is one
of only two candidates — Mike Huckabee is the other — to report more spending on
taxis than on Uber, according to the analysis.
[to top of second column] |
That’s funny, because Sanders has been far more outspoken than
Clinton about the ride-sharing app. He’s blasted Uber as an
unregulated corporation that’s destroying jobs and forcing workers
to accept lower wages.
In an August interview with Bloomberg, Sanders said he has
“serious problems” with Uber because the company is “unregulated.”
A spokesman for Uber later pointed out, to The Hill newspaper, that
Uber is in fact subject to regulations in 54 different jurisdictions
within the United States.
For what it’s worth, Clinton has also voiced support for changing
regulations on ride-sharing services like Uber.
“I’ll crack down on bosses who exploit employees by misclassifying
them as contractors,” she said in July, a pointed reference to an
ongoing legal battle in California, where some Uber workers are
challenging their status as contractors.
The California Labor Commission in June ruled the woman who filed
the lawsuit must be considered an employee of Uber, which, if
applied broadly, would wreck the business model for Uber and other
businesses in the sharing economy.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|