|
 The debate in Milwaukee was a mirror image of the Democratic
contest, in which candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are
proposing costly new federal family leave and college tuition
programs without detailed plans on how to pay for them.
Candidates from both parties are avoiding for now a discussion of
the tradeoffs that would dramatically change the way the U.S.
government raises and spends money.
Frontrunner Donald Trump promises to slash government revenues by
one-third over the coming decade, but he also has said he would not
cut popular health and retirement programs that account for half of
all government spending.
Florida Senator Marco Rubio has called for more military spending
and a new tax break for families, while promoting a tax plan that
would cut revenues by $6 trillion over a decade, according to the
Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank. He declined on Tuesday to
say how he would avoid wider deficits.
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul lectured his rival on the debate stage,
saying, "You can't be a conservative if you keep promoting new
programs you're not going to pay for."
Paul, who has been struggling to gain traction in the race, is one
of the few candidates who has laid out detailed spending cuts.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz also said on Tuesday that he would reduce the
impact of his proposed tax cuts by closing the Internal Revenue
Service and four other government agencies. The IRS has already laid
off thousands of agents in the past several years due to budget
cuts, which the agency says has hampered its ability to track down
tax cheats and left billions of dollars in uncollected taxes.
Shrinking government and cutting taxes have been core Republican
principles for decades, and the plans put forward by candidates in
the 2016 contest reflect the party's consensus that an overly
complex tax code is holding back the economy.
"Each one of those tax plans is better than the mess that we have
right now," Trump said of his and his rivals' plans.
BENEFITS FOR RICH
The view that the U.S. tax code is an economic drag is just one of
many complaints, along with the stark reality that it fails to raise
enough revenue to cover Washington's spending.
Rubio, Trump and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush would lower tax
rates and reduce the number of tax brackets from seven to two or
three. Texas Senator Ted Cruz and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson
propose a flat tax so rich and poor would pay the same rate.
Democrats Clinton, Sanders and Martin O'Malley have not yet released
detailed tax plans.
Nearly all the Republican candidates' tax plans that include enough
detail to merit a close look by experts would deliver the biggest
benefits to the wealthiest Americans, according to the Tax
Foundation.
[to top of second column]
|
All the Republicans' plans would slash government revenues over the
coming decade by between $1.7 trillion and $12 trillion. The
shortfall would be lessened if economists assume that tax cuts would
boost economic growth, but even in those scenarios all except Paul
would come up short on revenue, according to the Tax Foundation.
"These will require real cuts in government spending in order to
make the math work," said Tax Foundation analyst Kyle Pomerleau.
Federal spending under Democratic President Barack Obama since 2009
has been holding fairly steady between $3.4 trillion and $3.7
trillion while revenues have been rising steadily in step with
economic recovery, topping $3 trillion last year.
As a result the federal budget deficit has shrunk to 2.5 percent of
GDP in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, down from 9.8 percent of GDP
in fiscal 2009.
Tax cuts do not rank among the highest concerns of Republican
voters. According to a March survey by the Pew Research Center, only
one-third of Republicans say they are bothered by the amount they
pay in taxes. Roughly half want corporations and the wealthy to pay
more.
Voters also have shown little enthusiasm for cutting expensive
benefit programs such as Medicare and Social Security.
That might not matter for the Republican contenders. Since 2011,
Republicans in Congress have backed budgets seeking to overhaul
Medicare and deliver tax cuts for the rich, though Obama has blocked
this agenda. Over that period, Republicans have won control of the
Senate and widened their House of Representatives majority.
Any Republican president would likely have support in Congress to
deliver the tax cuts promised on the campaign trail, said Steven
Rosenthal, an analyst at the centrist Brookings-Urban Institute Tax
Policy Center. The question is how they would deal with the fallout
on spending and budget deficits.
"It's the proverbial dog chasing the car and catching it: what do I
do now?," he said.
(Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Tomasz Janowski)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
