New versions of several of their popular U.S. compact cars are
expected to be made in Mexico, people familiar with the companies'
plans said. They include General Motors Co’s new Chevrolet Cruze
hatchback, a successor to Ford Motor Co’s Focus compact and a
replacement for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV’s Jeep Compass compact
SUV.
The decisions are prompting three major automotive research firms,
who are often used by the automakers and their suppliers for
industry forecasting, to project a big increase in Mexican output of
small cars by the three companies.
AutoForecast Solutions estimates that GM, Ford and Fiat Chrysler
will collectively produce 45 percent of their small cars for the
North American market in Mexico by 2020, up from 18 percent in 2014.
LMC Automotive sees the 2020 figure at 37 percent, also against 18
percent last year, while IHS Automotive projects the Mexican
percentage going to 42 percent in five years time, though it
calculates the 2014 level at a higher level than the others, at 25
percent. In response to questions from Reuters, the three automakers
declined to discuss their specific plans.
GM said that the "vast majority" of its small cars sold in the U.S.
are "produced domestically." Ford said it is "committed to
continuing to improve competitiveness and to invest where it makes
the best sense for our business." Fiat Chrysler said it "has made no
official announcements regarding the company's future production
plans."
The Detroit automakers' plans to build more small cars in Mexico are
likely to be highly controversial ahead of the November 2016 U.S.
presidential election. Businessman Donald Trump, who is seeking to
win the nomination to be the Republican presidential candidate, has
repeatedly blasted U.S. companies, including Ford, for any moves to
shift jobs to Mexico from the U.S. and says he would support
government incentives to keep auto production in the United States
if he gets into the White House. The Trump campaign did not respond
to a request for comment.
It is also a huge issue for the U.S. labor unions, who have been
highly critical of the impact of free trade agreements, such as the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada
reached when Bill Clinton was U.S. President in 1994. His wife,
Hillary Clinton, is the leading contender to be the Democrats'
presidential candidate.
The Clinton campaign declined to comment.
United Auto Workers President Dennis Williams has faced criticism
from union members that he has acquiesced to jobs going south. "For
someone to suggest that we endorse products going to Mexico is just
nonsense," he wrote to UAW members last month. The UAW declined a
request for a comment for this story.
TINY PROFIT MARGINS
For the automakers it is largely a question of cost and margin. They
are determined to reduce costs in production of compact and midsize
cars, which already suffer from small profit margins or are losing
money.
Overall U.S. sales have been very strong in the past couple of years
but larger vehicles such as SUVs and pickup trucks are the big
beneficiaries because the plunge in gasoline prices means that fuel
economy isn’t as much of an issue for consumers as it was a few
years back. The larger vehicles typically generate profits of
$10,000 and more each.
The Big Three are also feeling the heat from foreign rivals,
including Nissan Motor Co and Volkswagen AG, who have been adding
production capacity in Mexico.
The margins on small cars may erode further if production remains in
the U.S. because new labor agreements negotiated by GM, Ford and
Chrysler grant the first raises in a decade to veteran workers, and
give recent hires a path to earn $30 an hour after eight years on
the job.
At the same time, the Detroit automakers need to continue building
and selling small cars to meet ever-tightening U.S. fuel economy
regulations because big pickups and SUVs have much lower mileage.
Mexican labor rates, which averaged about $5.50 an hour in 2014, are
about a fifth of the wages auto workers earn in the United States,
according to the Center for Automotive Research (CAR).
[to top of second column] |
Sean McAlinden, chief economist at CAR, said GM's Orion Township
assembly plant in Michigan, which builds Chevrolet and Buick
subcompacts, has the lowest labor costs of any U.S. plant thanks to
a favorable agreement with the UAW negotiated as part of the U.S.
government’s bailout of GM in 2009. And yet the Ford Fiesta plant in
Cuautitlan, near Mexico City, has a $700 labor cost advantage per
car over GM's Orion plant, he said.
With small car sales waning, GM recently announced layoffs at Orion.
According to sources at suppliers it is also expected to drop
production of the Buick Verano next year.
WEAKER CURRENCY
Mexico is an increasingly attractive production base for a variety
of reasons. Its infrastructure, supply base and productivity all
have improved in recent years, according to McAlinden. A plunge in
the Mexican peso against the dollar to almost 17 to the Greenback
from just over 13 a year ago has also made the country more
appealing for U.S. manufacturers, at least in the short term, by
reducing its relative costs.
On the downside, shipping costs from Mexico remain high, and energy
sources can be unreliable.
Ford confirmed last week in its tentative contract with the United
Auto Workers union that it will stop building Focus compact cars at
a factory in Wayne, Michigan in 2018. UAW officials have said the
replacement for the current Focus will be made in Mexico, while the
Michigan assembly plant is expected to start assembling a pickup
truck and an SUV, according to people familiar with Ford's plans.
Ford has declined to say what vehicles it plans to build in Wayne.
Supplier sources also said that GM plans to build the Cruze
hatchback in Mexico while the Cruze sedan will continue to be built
in Ohio, and that Fiat Chrysler has long planned to produce the
Compass replacement in Mexico rather than in Illinois. GM and Fiat
Chrysler declined to comment on where the vehicles will be made.
Moving production of mass-market, fuel-efficient sedans to Mexico is
a challenge to a goal the Obama administration stressed when it
drove government-funded restructurings of GM and the former Chrysler
in 2009. Gas prices had soared to $4 a gallon or more during the
2008 financial crisis, killing sales of Detroit's trucks.
GM and Fiat Chrysler agreed to build small cars in the U.S. as part
of their government-funded bankruptcies. Now profitable and free of
government ownership, their CEOs no longer must answer to the White
House. Ford, which restructured without federal help, shifted U.S.
production toward more fuel-efficient vehicles when truck sales
swooned, but now is ramping up U.S. production of SUVs and pickups
to meet robust demand.
Steven Rattner, the investor who was the first head of the White
House auto task force, said the threat to U.S. jobs was a concern
then and now.
"We were well aware of the situation with Mexico and the possibility
that jobs would continue to migrate there," he told Reuters.
(Reporting by Paul Lienert and Joseph White in Detroit; Editing by
Martin Howell)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|