For the fiscal year ending June 30, the union reported $37.6 million in 
political activity and lobbying expenditures, a $12.7 million increase from the 
previous year. 
 
Even more political spending was tucked away elsewhere in AFT’s annual U.S. 
Department of Labor filing, reported as “Contributions, Gifts and Grants,” 
“General Overhead” or “Representational Activities.” 
 
AFT paid union president Randi Weingarten, one of the nation’s most prominent 
“progressive” activists, a total of $497,118. The union reported only 2 percent 
of her time as political activity. 
 
Other expenditures suggest AFT’s decision to endorse Weingarten’s friend Hillary 
Clinton for president — a move that angered many AFT members — had been made 
long before it was announced in July.
  
AFT donated $250,000 to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation in 
February, $125,000 to Clinton Global Initiative in April and another $125,000 to 
Clinton Global Initiative in May. In December, AFT paid Clinton-allied 
opposition research group American Bridge 21st Century $100,000. 
 
The American Bridge payment was reported as a political expense. The payments to 
the scandal-ridden Clinton family nonprofits were not. 
 
Clinton was the only presidential candidate whose affiliated nonprofits got 
money from AFT in 2015. But, as in previous years, AFT funded a long list of 
left-wing political action committees, activist groups and think tanks. 
 
In many states, teachers can be required to pay AFT to have a job. Even though 
mandatory union fees can only legally be spent on representation, the power to 
take money from non-members frees AFT to spend more member dues on politics. 
 
RELATED: Teacher unions push progressive agenda, but many members aren’t on 
board 
 
AFT gave the Democratic Governors Association $1.5 million, gave Democratic 
super PAC Patriot Majority $450,000 and gave the Democratic Legislative Campaign 
Committee $400,000 last year. 
 
The union paid $410,000 to progressive coalition America Votes, $115,000 to 
MSNBC host Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, $90,000 to the 
environmentalist BlueGreen Alliance and $15,000 to illegal immigrant advocacy 
group National Council of La Raza. 
  
[to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  Millions of dollars of AFT payments to other political groups 
			weren’t reported as political spending, including $300,000 in 
			donations to Economic Policy Institute and $160,000 to National 
			Public Pension Coalition. 
			 
			A total of $323,889 in “advocacy organization” expenditures AFT 
			reported as general overhead included a $60,000 payment to leftist 
			donor network Democracy Alliance. 
			State Innovation Exchange, a pro-union attempt to copy the 
			pro-business American Legislative Exchange Council, received $60,000 
			from AFT last year; AFT reported only $30,000 as a political 
			expense. 
			 
			A $50,000 AFT donation to Center for American Progress Action Fund 
			was reported as a political expense, while a separate $50,000 
			donation to Center for American Progress wasn’t. 
			 
			The union spent millions more on membership recruitment drives 
			throughout the country, with $7.7 million in payments to “organizing 
			projects” reported to the Department of Labor as representation 
			costs. 
			 
			Hundreds of thousands of teachers are stuck paying AFT, regardless 
			of whether they agree with the union’s spending and activism. 
			Friedrichs vs. California Teachers Association, a case before the 
			Supreme Court, could change that within the next year. 
			
			  
			If the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs in the Friedrichs 
			case, it could end mandatory union fees for all public-sector 
			workers. 
			 
			AFT may come to regret “doubling down on a highly controversial 
			political agenda,” Gary Beckner, chairman and president of the 
			Association of American Educators, told Watchdog. 
			 
			“Teachers have had enough and are searching for affordable, 
			professional alternatives” like AAE, Beckner said. “Teachers deserve 
			an organization that supports the modern educator — without the 
			politics.” 
			 
			AFT’s Washington, D.C., headquarters did not respond to a request 
			for comment on the spending disclosed in the union’s 2015 annual 
			report. 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			 |