For the fiscal year ending June 30, the union reported $37.6 million in
political activity and lobbying expenditures, a $12.7 million increase from the
previous year.
Even more political spending was tucked away elsewhere in AFT’s annual U.S.
Department of Labor filing, reported as “Contributions, Gifts and Grants,”
“General Overhead” or “Representational Activities.”
AFT paid union president Randi Weingarten, one of the nation’s most prominent
“progressive” activists, a total of $497,118. The union reported only 2 percent
of her time as political activity.
Other expenditures suggest AFT’s decision to endorse Weingarten’s friend Hillary
Clinton for president — a move that angered many AFT members — had been made
long before it was announced in July.
AFT donated $250,000 to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation in
February, $125,000 to Clinton Global Initiative in April and another $125,000 to
Clinton Global Initiative in May. In December, AFT paid Clinton-allied
opposition research group American Bridge 21st Century $100,000.
The American Bridge payment was reported as a political expense. The payments to
the scandal-ridden Clinton family nonprofits were not.
Clinton was the only presidential candidate whose affiliated nonprofits got
money from AFT in 2015. But, as in previous years, AFT funded a long list of
left-wing political action committees, activist groups and think tanks.
In many states, teachers can be required to pay AFT to have a job. Even though
mandatory union fees can only legally be spent on representation, the power to
take money from non-members frees AFT to spend more member dues on politics.
RELATED: Teacher unions push progressive agenda, but many members aren’t on
board
AFT gave the Democratic Governors Association $1.5 million, gave Democratic
super PAC Patriot Majority $450,000 and gave the Democratic Legislative Campaign
Committee $400,000 last year.
The union paid $410,000 to progressive coalition America Votes, $115,000 to
MSNBC host Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, $90,000 to the
environmentalist BlueGreen Alliance and $15,000 to illegal immigrant advocacy
group National Council of La Raza.
[to top of second column] |
Millions of dollars of AFT payments to other political groups
weren’t reported as political spending, including $300,000 in
donations to Economic Policy Institute and $160,000 to National
Public Pension Coalition.
A total of $323,889 in “advocacy organization” expenditures AFT
reported as general overhead included a $60,000 payment to leftist
donor network Democracy Alliance.
State Innovation Exchange, a pro-union attempt to copy the
pro-business American Legislative Exchange Council, received $60,000
from AFT last year; AFT reported only $30,000 as a political
expense.
A $50,000 AFT donation to Center for American Progress Action Fund
was reported as a political expense, while a separate $50,000
donation to Center for American Progress wasn’t.
The union spent millions more on membership recruitment drives
throughout the country, with $7.7 million in payments to “organizing
projects” reported to the Department of Labor as representation
costs.
Hundreds of thousands of teachers are stuck paying AFT, regardless
of whether they agree with the union’s spending and activism.
Friedrichs vs. California Teachers Association, a case before the
Supreme Court, could change that within the next year.
If the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs in the Friedrichs
case, it could end mandatory union fees for all public-sector
workers.
AFT may come to regret “doubling down on a highly controversial
political agenda,” Gary Beckner, chairman and president of the
Association of American Educators, told Watchdog.
“Teachers have had enough and are searching for affordable,
professional alternatives” like AAE, Beckner said. “Teachers deserve
an organization that supports the modern educator — without the
politics.”
AFT’s Washington, D.C., headquarters did not respond to a request
for comment on the spending disclosed in the union’s 2015 annual
report.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|