Pentagon sees big impact if Congress
fails to pass FY16 budget
Send a link to a friend
[October 07, 2015]
By Idrees Ali and Andrea Shalal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Defense
Department would protect spending on operations and readiness if
Congress fails to pass a budget for fiscal 2016, leaving procurement
programs to shoulder most of the impact, the Pentagon's chief arms buyer
said Tuesday.
|
Defense Undersecretary Frank Kendall said a long-term continuing
resolution would maintain spending at last year's levels. That could
cause the department to break multi-year agreements with companies
and result in expensive penalties, he said.
Kendall was speaking at an event in Arlington, Virginia, at Defense
One, a publication that covers the military.
After the event, Kendall told reporters that he expected a defense
authorization bill to be passed without the Overseas Contingency
Operations (OCO) in it. The OCO, also known as the war fund, is
money intended to fund ongoing wars and does not count against
budget caps.
President Barack Obama has said he would veto the $612 billion
defense authorization bill under consideration in the U.S. Senate,
because of the "irresponsible way" it boosts military spending. The
bill includes money for the OCO.
"If the bill is vetoed, my expectation is that part of the bill
would be stripped out and the remainder of the bill would be
passed," he said, referring to the OCO being taken out.
The Senate voted on Tuesday to limit debate on the bill, clearing
the way for a vote on passage.
One lobbyist said lawmakers could potentially agree to carve out the
OCO provisions and pass the policy bill to ensure that various
acquisition and compensation reforms proceeded.
During the event, the acquisition chiefs for the different armed
services spoke of their concerns about a continuing resolution and
the impact it would have on their programs.
[to top of second column] |
The top Army arms buyer, Heidi Shyu, said about 400 programs would
be affected by a year-long continuing resolution. She added that
they could not expand work on the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle
(AMPV), awarded to BAE Systems Plc.
Sean Stackley, the Navy's arms buyer, said a yearlong continuing
resolution or sequestration would have an $11 billion impact on the
Navy.
Stackley said new starts would have to be slowed down including the
George Washington aircraft carrier, refueling and complex overhaul,
and the Navy TAO(X) oiler shipbuilding program.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and David
Gregorio)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|