Jay Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, and hip hop producer
Timothy "Timbaland" Mosley are among the defendants named in a
2007 complaint by the nephew of late Egyptian songwriter Baligh
Hamdy, who alleged that the rapper had used his uncle's
composition without permission.
Jay Z, wearing a navy suit and tie, sat between his lawyers at
the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles as he silently observed
the afternoon's proceedings. He told Reuters he had no comment
on the case.
He is scheduled to testify on Wednesday.
Jay Z's lawyer Andrew Bart argued Tuesday that the explicit
lyrics of "Big Pimpin'" should not be discussed in relation to
the lawsuit, as a depiction of the words as "vulgar" and
"disgusting" could prejudice the jury against Jay Z.
U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder ruled in his favor,
saying examining Jay Z's lyrics would be irrelevant in this
case.
Attorney Peter Ross, representing Hamdy's nephew Osama Ahmed
Fahmy, told the eight-member jury that Jay Z and his producers
had purposefully avoided asking permission to use Hamdy's track
because they allegedly knew it wouldn't be granted given the
risqué lyrics.
"You have to go to the composer himself, or his heirs, play the
work, and get his approval," Ross said. "That, he never did."
[to top of second column] |
The lawsuit follows another high-profile musical copyright case. In
March, the heirs of late soul singer Marvin Gaye successfully sued
artists Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for $7.4 million for
plagiarizing Gaye in their hit "Blurred Lines."
Attorney Christine Lepera, representing Timbaland and other
defendants, told the jury that Fahmy's suit is an "effort to get an
undeserved income."
Released in 1999, "Big Pimpin'" was a breakout hit for Jay Z. Forbes
estimated his wealth at $520 million in 2014.
Lepera said Timbaland used Hamdy's 1957 Egyptian tune "Khosara,
Khosara" as a chorus loop for "Big Pimpin'" without realizing it was
owned by EMI Music Arabia. The producers later paid $100,000 to EMI
Music Arabia to acquire the license.
But Fahmy has argued in court documents that the payment is
inconsequential, and that only Hamdy's heirs have the right to
approve a derivative work of the late musician's composition.
(Editing by Piya Sinha-Roy and Richard Pullin)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |