Colorado
mine wastewater spill caused by EPA was preventable: report
Send a link to a friend
[October 23, 2015]
By Keith Coffman
DENVER (Reuters) - The release of 3
million gallons (11 million liters) of toxic wastewater from a defunct
southwestern Colorado gold mine that was triggered by the Environmental
Protection Agency was preventable, a government review of the spill
concluded on Thursday.
|
A 132-page report conducted by engineers with the U.S Bureau of
Reclamation said the Aug. 5 blowout from the Gold King Mine above
Silverton, Colorado, was due to a combination of factors “spanning
several decades.”
Nearby mining operations and tunneling beneath the century-old stake
led to changing groundwater conditions that the EPA failed to
anticipate when it reopened a portal on the site in recent years,
the report said.
An excavating crew under contract with the EPA to slow seepage from
the site inadvertently breached a tunnel wall, unleashing a torrent
of wastewater that had backed up behind the mountainside.
The water, carrying heavy metals, poured into Cement Creek, and then
downstream into the Animas and San Juan rivers, turning the
waterways a bright orange. The plume ultimately emptied into Lake
Powell in Utah nine days after the spill.
The governors of Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, the three states
affected by the spill, all declared a state of emergency in its
aftermath.
EPA chief Gina McCarthy said her agency was taking full
responsibility for the spill, and has said the water quality of
stream fouled by the release have returned to pre-spill levels.
The Bureau of Reclamation engineers said in their report that there
are no uniform protocols among the government agencies charged with
cleaning up the estimated 100,000 abandoned mines that dot the
western United States.
“The incident at Gold King Mine is somewhat emblematic of the
current state of practice in abandoned mine remediation,” they said.
[to top of second column] |
The report recommended that for future mine remediation projects,
agencies should include a “failure modes analysis,” a review of the
history of each site, and precise water measurements.
“Where significant consequences of failure are possible,
independent expertise should be obtained to review project plans and
designs prior to implementation,” the report said.
U.S. Senator Cory Gardner of Colorado said in a statement that he
was “deeply troubled” that the EPA was not only responsible for the
spill but that it was preventable.
“I look forward to a response to my questions surrounding the EPA’s
insufficient and untimely recovery efforts and its proactive
measures to prevent a disaster of similar magnitude in the future,"
Gardner said.
(Reporting by Keith Coffman; Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|