| 
            
			 Novak’s total retirement holdings, including deferred compensation, 
			are worth $234 million - more than any other Fortune 500 chief 
			executive. 
			 
			Novak tops the list of Fortune 500 CEOs with the largest retirement 
			nest eggs, according to a study from two progressive think tanks - 
			the Center for Effective Government and the Institute for Policy 
			Studies. 
			 
			Their data comes from Security & Exchange Commission filings for the 
			500 largest public companies. The figures are stunning and cast a 
			harsh and troubling light on soaring retirement inequality. The 
			report offers yet another indication that runaway income inequality 
			is producing grossly unfair retirement outcomes. 
			 
			The top CEO retirement accounts are worth a combined $4.9 billion - 
			equal to the total retirement account savings of the 41 percent of 
			all American households with the lowest retirement wealth, according 
			to the study. 
			 
			Among all Fortune 500 CEOs, the typical value is $17.7 million. That 
			includes the present value of defined benefit pensions, 401(k) 
			account balances and other deferred compensation. 
			
			  
			John Hammergren, CEO of drug wholesaler McKesson Corp <MCK.N> - 
			which froze its employee pension fund in 1996 - has the largest 
			Fortune 500 pension account, valued at $114 million. 
			 
			McKesson declined to comment. A spokeswoman for YUM noted its stock 
			appreciated 900 percent during Novak's tenure. 
			 
			THE REST OF US 
			 
			The CEO numbers are a stark contrast to the rest of us. In 2013, 
			pre-retirement households (age 55-64) with annual income below 
			$39,000 had median total retirement savings of $13,000 in 401(k) and 
			IRA accounts, according to the Center for Retirement Research. 
			Middle-class households (income from $61,000 to $100,000) had median 
			savings of $100,000. Only in the highest-income band ($138,000 or 
			more) were accumulations significant, at a median of $452,000. 
			 
			Changes in our retirement benefit structure play a big role in 
			account balances - especially the sharp decline in the share of 
			private-sector workers receiving traditional defined benefit 
			pensions. 
			 
			In the past decade, 54 Fortune 500 companies changed their defined 
			benefit pension plans, according to the Pension Rights Center - 
			either reducing benefits, freezing plans or closing them to new 
			hires, or terminating them altogether. 
			 
			“Growth in CEO pay itself is one factor, along with the shift of 
			employees out of defined benefit plans to less costly 401(k) plans, 
			which have less risk for the employer,” says Scott Klinger, director 
			of revenue and spending policies at the Center for Effective 
			Government and co-author of the report. 
			 
			
			  
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			The growing mountain of evidence on retirement inequality is adding 
			to momentum to change national retirement policies in favor of 
			middle and lower-income households. The starting point should be an 
			expansion of Social Security to boost benefits for middle- and 
			lower-income workers, an idea embraced by people like Democratic 
			presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. Nothing else would have a 
			broader, bigger impact. 
			Beyond that, we need to make access to workplace retirement saving 
			universal. The Obama administration’s recent move to clear the path 
			for states to create their own universal auto-IRA plans is a good 
			start. The financial services industry opposes these programs on 
			ideological grounds - mainly because they are seen as government 
			mandates. 
			 
			MANDATORY SAVING 
			Even so, opposition is loosening a bit. That was clear in a 
			remarkable speech this month by Tony James, president of Blackstone 
			- one of the world’s largest private equity firms. James issued a 
			call for a universal, mandatory system of saving for all workers who 
			do not currently have access to a workplace plan. 
			 
			Specifically, he endorsed the Guaranteed Retirement Account (GRA), 
			which is the brainchild of Teresa Ghilarducci, a labor economist at 
			the New School for Social Research in New York City. The GRA calls 
			for mandatory worker and employer contributions to a low-cost, 
			professionally managed account. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			“There is really no alternative; it has to be mandated," James said. 
			"I know that can be a politically loaded word these days, but I 
			assure you that nothing short of a mandate will provide future 
			generations of Americans enough income for a secure retirement.” 
			 
			Blackstone is not run by fire-breathing liberals. Its founders are 
			deficit-hawk-in-chief Peter Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman, who 
			several years ago infamously compared an Obama plan to raise taxes 
			on carried interest taxes to the 1939 Nazi invasion of Poland. 
			Even Ghilarducci thinks positive movement might be coming. “I never 
			thought 25 years ago we’d be talking about Social Security expansion 
			- but here we are.” 
			 
			(Editing by Beth Pinsker, Lauren Young and Dan Grebler) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |