| 
            
			 President Barack Obama, deeply averse to over-committing American 
			troops to unpopular wars in the Middle East, could view some of the 
			options as more viable than others as he approaches the final 
			stretch of his presidency. 
			 
			Still, Obama's administration is under pressure to ramp up America's 
			effort, particularly after the fall of the Iraqi city of Ramadi to 
			Islamic State in May and the failure of a U.S. military program to 
			train and arm thousands of Syrian rebels. 
			 
			Two U.S. officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity 
			to discuss ongoing deliberations, said any deployments would be 
			narrowly tailored, seeking to advance specific, limited military 
			objectives in both Iraq and Syria. 
			 
			That option includes temporarily deploying some U.S. special 
			operations forces inside of Syria to advise moderate Syrian 
			opposition fighters for the first time and, potentially, to help 
			call in U.S. air strikes, one official said. 
			
			  Other possibilities including sending a small number of Apache 
			attack helicopters, and U.S. forces to operate them, to Iraq, as 
			well as taking steps to bolster other Iraqi capabilities needed to 
			claw back territory from Islamic State. 
			 
			The deliberations come as the United States looks to Syrian 
			opposition fighters it supports to put pressure on Raqqa, the 
			Islamic State's stronghold, and for Iraqi forces to retake Ramadi 
			after the city fell to the militants earlier this year. 
			 
			The options appeared to stop short of deploying American troops in 
			any direct ground combat roles, something Obama has so far ruled 
			out. 
			 
			One of the officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of 
			anonymity, said the proposals were still in a conceptual stage - 
			meaning that even if any were approved in the coming days, a U.S. 
			military deployment could still be weeks or months away. 
			 
			The Pentagon and White House declined comment on the options, which 
			were also reported by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal. 
			 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			Earlier on Tuesday, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter signaled his 
			intent to step up the U.S. military's activity in Iraq and Syria, 
			just days after U.S. forces participated in a raid to rescue Islamic 
			State hostages in Iraq. 
			 
			One U.S. soldier was killed in that mission. 
			 
			"We won't hold back from supporting capable partners in 
			opportunistic attacks against ISIL or conducting such missions 
			directly, whether by strikes from the air or direct action on the 
			ground," Carter told a Senate hearing, using an acronym for the 
			militant group. 
			 
			Marine Corp General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
			Staff, told the Senate hearing he would consider recommending 
			putting more U.S. forces with Iraqi troops to support the Islamic 
			State fight if it improved chances of defeating the militants. 
			 
			"If it had operational or strategic impact and we could reinforce 
			success, that would be the basic framework within which I'd make a 
			recommendation for additional forces to be co-located with Iraqi 
			units," Dunford said, without elaborating. 
			 
			(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Lisa Shumaker) 
			
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			   |