| 
						 
						
						
						 How 
						the budget deal changes Social Security for couples 
						
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		[October 29, 2015] 
		By Mark Miller 
						
		CHICAGO (Reuters) - Among its many 
		provisions, the budget deal moving quickly through Congress puts an end 
		to "file-and-suspend," a lucrative strategy for couples that can boost 
		lifetime Social Security retirement benefits by hundreds of thousands of 
		dollars. 
             | 
        	
			
            | 
            
			
			 File-and-suspend was a little-known strategy until a few years ago, 
			but it has been quickly gaining popularity because it permits 
			married couples to have their cake and eat it too. 
			 
			The strategy calls for the higher-earning spouse to file for Social 
			Security benefits at his or her full retirement age, but then 
			suspend that filing while the benefit grows, until as late as 70. 
			The lower-earning spouse can then claim spousal benefits at his or 
			her own full retirement age, and later shift to their own full 
			benefit, if it is larger. (A spousal benefit is half of the primary 
			earner's benefit.) 
			 
			The Center for Retirement Research has estimated that 
			file-and-suspend adds $9.5 billion in annual benefit costs to the 
			program. 
			  
			
			  
			 
			The White House targeted it for elimination in the budget plan 
			issued last year, calling it an "aggressive" move used by 
			high-income households to "manipulate" benefits. The budget deal 
			approved by the House this week would clamp down on the practice for 
			anyone who turns age 62 after calendar year 2015. 
			 
			File-and-suspend has been at the top of the list for reform over the 
			past year - and it was thrown into this deal as part of the 
			political horse trading that yielded the crucial agreement to beef 
			up Social Security’s disability insurance trust fund. 
			 
			That fund is on track to run out of money next year, which would 
			have produced an immediate 19 percent cut in disability benefits; 
			that problem has now been pushed down the road to 2022. 
			 
			The budget deal reallocates funds from Social Security’s retirement 
			trust fund - a move pressed for by disability advocates and the 
			White House but resisted by Republicans. 
			 
			FOLLOW THE MONEY 
			 
			The original bill language also implied that benefits would be ended 
			for spouses who already were receiving benefits under a spouse’s 
			suspended filing. 
			 
			That would have been a damaging, unwise move since it would have 
			pulled the rug out from people relying on benefits - and it would 
			have been an administrative nightmare for the Social Security 
			Administration. 
			
			  
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			  
			Congressional sources say that was never the intent, and that the 
			language in the bill is being revised to clarify that only new 
			file-and-suspends are disallowed, beginning 180 days after the bill 
			is signed into law. That opens a window for six more months for 
			people to file and suspend, if they choose that strategy. 
			More routine spousal strategies will remain in place, and couples 
			should study them carefully. It still makes sense for higher-earning 
			spouses to delay their filing, and some lower-earning spouses may 
			want to file for the 50 percent spousal benefit ahead of their own 
			full retirement ages, if that benefit is greater than their own full 
			benefit. (For more on how much couples can reap in additional 
			benefits, see http://reut.rs/1ePEqXg) 
			 
			It is also possible to boost Social Security benefits through 
			delayed filing by continuing to work or by drawing down retirement 
			nest eggs to fund living expenses in the early years of retirement 
			while allowing eventual Social Security benefits to grow. 
			 
			Still, the rapid-fire nature of the budget deal shows the need for a 
			more serious, long-range debate about Social Security. 
			  
			
			  
			"There hasn’t been a discussion since the Bowles-Simpson commission 
			(about five years ago) about serious, fundamental Social Security 
			reform,” says Jason Fichtner, senior research fellow at the Mercatus 
			Center at George Mason University, and a former deputy commissioner 
			of the Social Security Administration. “Frankly, reform should be 
			done holistically, but instead this got done as part of a 
			negotiation over the disability insurance problem.” 
			 
			(Editing by Beth Pinsker and Jonathan Oatis) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |