How
the budget deal changes Social Security for couples
Send a link to a friend
[October 29, 2015]
By Mark Miller
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Among its many
provisions, the budget deal moving quickly through Congress puts an end
to "file-and-suspend," a lucrative strategy for couples that can boost
lifetime Social Security retirement benefits by hundreds of thousands of
dollars.
|
File-and-suspend was a little-known strategy until a few years ago,
but it has been quickly gaining popularity because it permits
married couples to have their cake and eat it too.
The strategy calls for the higher-earning spouse to file for Social
Security benefits at his or her full retirement age, but then
suspend that filing while the benefit grows, until as late as 70.
The lower-earning spouse can then claim spousal benefits at his or
her own full retirement age, and later shift to their own full
benefit, if it is larger. (A spousal benefit is half of the primary
earner's benefit.)
The Center for Retirement Research has estimated that
file-and-suspend adds $9.5 billion in annual benefit costs to the
program.
The White House targeted it for elimination in the budget plan
issued last year, calling it an "aggressive" move used by
high-income households to "manipulate" benefits. The budget deal
approved by the House this week would clamp down on the practice for
anyone who turns age 62 after calendar year 2015.
File-and-suspend has been at the top of the list for reform over the
past year - and it was thrown into this deal as part of the
political horse trading that yielded the crucial agreement to beef
up Social Security’s disability insurance trust fund.
That fund is on track to run out of money next year, which would
have produced an immediate 19 percent cut in disability benefits;
that problem has now been pushed down the road to 2022.
The budget deal reallocates funds from Social Security’s retirement
trust fund - a move pressed for by disability advocates and the
White House but resisted by Republicans.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
The original bill language also implied that benefits would be ended
for spouses who already were receiving benefits under a spouse’s
suspended filing.
That would have been a damaging, unwise move since it would have
pulled the rug out from people relying on benefits - and it would
have been an administrative nightmare for the Social Security
Administration.
[to top of second column] |
Congressional sources say that was never the intent, and that the
language in the bill is being revised to clarify that only new
file-and-suspends are disallowed, beginning 180 days after the bill
is signed into law. That opens a window for six more months for
people to file and suspend, if they choose that strategy.
More routine spousal strategies will remain in place, and couples
should study them carefully. It still makes sense for higher-earning
spouses to delay their filing, and some lower-earning spouses may
want to file for the 50 percent spousal benefit ahead of their own
full retirement ages, if that benefit is greater than their own full
benefit. (For more on how much couples can reap in additional
benefits, see http://reut.rs/1ePEqXg)
It is also possible to boost Social Security benefits through
delayed filing by continuing to work or by drawing down retirement
nest eggs to fund living expenses in the early years of retirement
while allowing eventual Social Security benefits to grow.
Still, the rapid-fire nature of the budget deal shows the need for a
more serious, long-range debate about Social Security.
"There hasn’t been a discussion since the Bowles-Simpson commission
(about five years ago) about serious, fundamental Social Security
reform,” says Jason Fichtner, senior research fellow at the Mercatus
Center at George Mason University, and a former deputy commissioner
of the Social Security Administration. “Frankly, reform should be
done holistically, but instead this got done as part of a
negotiation over the disability insurance problem.”
(Editing by Beth Pinsker and Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |