| 
             
			
			 Researchers write in JAMA Surgery that the results may be due to 
			helmeted riders being more likely to survive high-force crashes than 
			people who don't wear helmets, and ultimately end up with more 
			extensive injuries. 
			 
			"The fact that injury patterns are different makes a lot of sense, 
			because the helmets are going to help you survive," said Dr. Adil 
			Haider, of the Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and 
			Women's Hospital in Boston. 
			 
			"A lot of people have all these torso injuries because their head is 
			saved," said Haider, who wasn't involved in the new study. 
			 
			While researchers knew helmets decreased injuries and death related 
			to motorcycle trauma, they didn't know whether or how the protective 
			head gear might affect injuries to other body parts. 
			
			  
			The authors write that loosening restrictions on helmets in some 
			U.S. states allowed them to study how wearing head protection may 
			influence other injuries. 
			 
			For the study, they used national data from 2007 to 2010 on almost 
			86,000 people with some sort of motorcycle-related trauma. The 
			researchers paid particularly close attention to the number and 
			extent of injuries to people's heads and necks, torsos, spines and 
			extremities. 
			 
			Overall, the researchers found helmeted motorcycle riders were about 
			half as likely to end up with head injuries, compared to those who 
			weren't wearing protection. Helmeted riders were also less likely to 
			die. 
			 
			Helmeted riders were more likely to have injuries to the chest and 
			extremities than riders who weren't wearing helmets, however. 
			 
			Other than saving the lives of riders during high-force accidents, 
			another explanation for increased injuries to other body parts could 
			be that helmeted riders feel more secure and end up driving at 
			higher speeds, the researchers, led by Indiana University's Dr. Jeff 
			Lastfogel, write. 
			 
			There was no difference in the time people spent in a hospital 
			regardless of whether they were helmeted. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
				
			Dr. David Ripley, who was not involved in the research, cautioned, 
			though, that the study can't really say if people ended up going 
			home after being in the hospital. Some may, for example, have been 
			transferred to a long term care center. 
			 
			"These people are still hospitalized, but they are not in the acute 
			care hospital," said Ripley, who is medical director of brain injury 
			medicine and rehabilitation at the Rehabilitation Institute of 
			Chicago. 
			 
			He said that policymakers should consider the cost of additional 
			care for people who don't wear helmets and likely end up with head 
			injuries. 
			 
			"From a public health perspective, policymakers should recognize the 
			increased cost associated with these individuals and respond with 
			the appropriate public policy," he said. 
			 
			Additionally, Ripley said, he recommends as much protective gear as 
			possible - including helmets. 
			 
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1LogIjO JAMA Surgery, online October 21, 2015. 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			   |