| 
		 
		
		
		 Sandusky 
		returning to Pennsylvania court to press appeal for new trial 
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		[October 29, 2015] 
		By David DeKok 
		  
		 HARRISBURG, Pa. (Reuters) - Convicted 
		child molester Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant football coach at Penn 
		State University, returns to court on Thursday in his effort to get a 
		new trial. 
             | 
        	
			
            | 
            
			 Sandusky, 71, will seek to persuade Senior Judge John Cleland, who 
			presided at the 2012 trial where the ex-coach was found guilty of 
			sexually assaulting children, to allow him to take steps toward 
			researching the competence of his lawyers and whether his rights 
			were violated at trial. 
			 
			“Mr. Sandusky's due process right to a fair trial was not only 
			infringed, it was crushed under a stampede of vitriol, rage, and 
			prejudice that mandate a new trial in this case,” wrote his lawyer, 
			Alexander Lindsay, in court papers before the hearing in Bellefonte, 
			Pennsylvania. 
			 
			Lindsay said Cleland should have delayed the Sandusky trial to let 
			passions cool. 
			
			  Sandusky was convicted of 45 of 48 charges of molesting 10 boys at 
			Penn State and other locations over a 15-year period. He is serving 
			30 to 60 years in the state's "Supermax" prison in Waynesburg. 
			 
			His original lawyers were Joseph Amendola of State College and Karl 
			Rominger of Carlisle. Amendola could not be reached for comment on 
			Wednesday. Rominger was disbarred by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court 
			in 2014 for stealing another client’s money. 
			 
			Sandusky will seek permission on Thursday to research people 
			connected to his case, including former state Attorney General Tom 
			Corbett and Sara Ganim, the Harrisburg Patriot-News reporter who 
			broke the Sandusky story in 2011 and won a Pulitzer Prize. 
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
			His lawyer contends Ganim wrote her story with illegally leaked 
			grand jury information and that it kept the Sandusky investigation 
			alive by prompting more alleged victims to come forward. 
			 
			Lawyers for the attorney general were dismissive of Sandusky's 
			claims in their legal response, saying he must prove "exceptional 
			circumstances" to be allowed to conduct discovery for a 
			post-conviction hearing. 
			 
			"At this juncture, the burden rests squarely on Sandusky's shoulders 
			to prove he’s entitled to discovery," they said. 
			 
			(Editing by Scott Malone and Peter Cooney) 
			
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			
			   |