| 
				 In a party line vote, Republicans on the House Committee on 
				Education and the Workforce unanimously supported a one-sentence 
				measure to amend the National Labor Relations Act to establish 
				that joint employment only exists when two or more businesses 
				share "actual, direct and immediate" control over working 
				conditions. 
				 
				In August, the National Labor Relations Board handed down a 
				decision in Browning-Ferris Industries Inc, which said joint 
				employment can exist when there is direct, indirect or potential 
				control over working conditions. 
				 
				Trade groups have decried the Browning-Ferris decision, claiming 
				it could upend franchising, supply chains and business models 
				that depend on contract labor. But some legal experts have 
				argued those fears are unfounded because the decision is narrow, 
				adopting a common-law definition of employment already applied 
				in other contexts. 
				 
				In one of the first applications of the Browning-Ferris 
				decision, an NLRB judge on Oct. 21 found that an asbestos 
				remover in Silver Spring, Maryland does not share control over 
				employees with the Baltimore-based staffing firm supplying the 
				workers. 
				 
				The bill's next step is a vote before the full House of 
				Representatives before being considered by the Senate. But the 
				measure is not expected to have enough support to overcome a 
				presidential veto even if Congress passes it. 
				 
				(Reporting by Robert Iafolla; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and 
				Tom Brown) 
			[© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2015 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.   | 
				
				
				 |